CricAddict
Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah you are right. Pant will be a good choice.I will give it to Pant.. Impact innings everytime he batted and very tidy keeping under generally tough conditions for a keeper.
Yeah you are right. Pant will be a good choice.I will give it to Pant.. Impact innings everytime he batted and very tidy keeping under generally tough conditions for a keeper.
I am surprised if anyone would have a nerve to criticize Indian pitches after current Aus- Pak series.The pacers taking 7 cheap wickets , these green mambas India produce are getting out of hand I tell you.
Yes, and imagine what Axar-Ash-Jaddu would have done to their batters. Pink ball adds a whole new dimension to spin bowling in SC conditions. Some of the deliveries just get very slippery and the natural variations become even more difficult.Pink ball tests in India are fun officially.
Just visualize the carnage if the four pronged Windies attack bowled with the pink ball in India.
you probably don’t realise pitches of variable bounce and lateral movement makes batting difficult against all kinds of bowling. It’s funny but this pitch seems to have changed more on cw than at the ground. Apparently it was as a monster when India began batting on it to nothing wrong with it - perfectly good pitch now that India are comfortably in front. Hmmm.Its those tracks that are batting beauties when we bat and then become green mambas when our seamers bowl and become dustbowls when our spinners come on.
It's always been hard to bat on, as I said originally. It made me really impressed by Iyer's innings.you probably don’t realise pitches of variable bounce and lateral movement makes batting difficult against all kinds of bowling. It’s funny but this pitch seems to have changed more on cw than at the ground. Apparently it was as a monster when India began batting on it to nothing wrong with it - perfectly good pitch now that India are comfortably in front. Hmmm.
Did you just ‘no u’ the true master of the ‘no u’you probably don’t realise pitches of variable bounce and lateral movement makes batting difficult against all kinds of bowling. It’s funny but this pitch seems to have changed more on cw than at the ground. Apparently it was as a monster when India began batting on it to nothing wrong with it - perfectly good pitch now that India are comfortably in front. Hmmm.
No. (You kid).Did you just ‘no u’ the true master of the ‘no u’
I am not sure how you read this and concluded that is what I said... For reference, this is what I said about the pitch. The lateral movement is more and at apparently quicker pace under lights, from what I have seen. Just lateral movement on a slow surface can be negotiable. Its almost as if you decided I must have said something instead of actually reading what was posted. Hmmmm.you probably don’t realise pitches of variable bounce and lateral movement makes batting difficult against all kinds of bowling. It’s funny but this pitch seems to have changed more on cw than at the ground. Apparently it was as a monster when India began batting on it to nothing wrong with it - perfectly good pitch now that India are comfortably in front. Hmmm.
I think the first session yesterday was the best one for spinners.. and hardest to face them for batters. The second session was still very much loaded towards the spinners and I think apart from a few overs of early swing, nothing from the seamers looked much threatening until India bowled. When India bowled, pitch had settled down enough that spin was not as much of a problem but the ball did seem to do a bit more under lights for Bumrah and Shami and their extra pace obviously added to the challenge.
IT was but I think it does more for the seamers under lights than it does in the first two sessions. If anything, I am trying to say India had only one type of issue to face when they batted but Sri Lanka unfortunately have had to face both threats when they batted.It's always been hard to bat on, as I said originally. It made me really impressed by Iyer's innings.
Nah this is nonsense. We'll need separate stats for each ball then - Dukes, Kookaburra, SG. They're all different, that's the point.Also, I am totally on-board with KP asking for a different set of stats for pink ball cricket. It's is a totally different challenge for batters than traditional tests.
No no, don't get me wrong. I'm overjoyed at a wonderful story of redemption. At the beginning of the match the pitch appeared to be slandered so excuses could be provisioned against the possibility of an embarrassing collapse. When that didn't happen and as the game moved on, a miraculous thing happened: The pitch, influenced by parochialism, jingoism and bullspin reformed into just the sort of thing that should host test matches. I am pleased, as we all are, by stories of rehabilitation and bad boys made good.I am not sure how you read this and concluded that is what I said... For reference, this is what I said about the pitch. The lateral movement is more and at apparently quicker pace under lights, from what I have seen. Just lateral movement on a slow surface can be negotiable. Its almost as if you decided I must have said something instead of actually reading what was posted. Hmmm
OkNo no, don't get me wrong. I'm overjoyed at a wonderful story of redemption. At the beginning of the match the pitch appeared to be slandered so excuses could be provisioned against the possibility of an embarrassing collapse. When that didn't happen and as the game moved on, a miraculous thing happened: The pitch, influenced by parochialism, jingoism and bullspin reformed into just the sort of thing that should host test matches. I am pleased, as we all are, by stories of rehabilitation and bad boys made good.
To me, the first innings was definitely the pitch. I think even Bradman would have gotten out to that one. But the second innings, it was his mistake as much as anything else. He should have learned to press forward inspite of the trajectory. That is basically not learning from what was happening so far in the game.the pitch still isn't great but Iyer showed getting runs on it is possible. Definitely prefer this to the tarmac Pakistan have laid out.
I find it really funny that the Kohli is the only batter to have gotten out to a ball that had shot through low. Twice.
who even said this lol, the pitch sucks ballsNo no, don't get me wrong. I'm overjoyed at a wonderful story of redemption. At the beginning of the match the pitch appeared to be slandered so excuses could be provisioned against the possibility of an embarrassing collapse. When that didn't happen and as the game moved on, a miraculous thing happened: The pitch, influenced by parochialism, jingoism and bullspin reformed into just the sort of thing that should host test matches. I am pleased, as we all are, by stories of rehabilitation and bad boys made good.