Especially when ones on debut and ones coming off a duck on debut!Brillant, Bloody brillant. Picking five batsmen is looking like a genius move right now.
Jeez it's like you have to score a century every game isn't itTaylor at #3 is just stupid really.
Agreed, in T20s possibly, ODI's 4 or preferably 5Taylor at #3 is just stupid really.
Taylor not at #3 is stupid.Taylor at #3 is just stupid really.
And he still struggled during the first 10-15 overs of the game. As he did today and got out - which is what happens rather a lot in that position (if you bother to look at his innings at #3 which include some freebies against minnow sides to prop up the average to what is still a good 7-8 runs below what he manages at #4).He just scored a brilliant 95 in the last game with us 28-3 in a 190 run partnership! Am I missing something?
^ 100%and he still struggled during the first 10-15 overs of the game. As he did today and got out - which is what happens rather a lot in that position (if you bother to look at his innings at #3 which include some freebies against minnow sides to prop up the average to what is still a good 7-8 runs below what he manages at #4).
He's a #4. It's blatant. At #3 the ball is likely still swinging and taylor basically ends up trying not to play across the line and not trying to plant his front foot down the pitch.
Ruining your only available proven quality bat is absolute stupidity. Taylor should be the first guy down on the team sheet. He bats 4. Styris is next, he bats 5. Then worry about the rest. I'm so going to laugh at you lot if someone else actually gets settled at #4 and then you start whinging about taylor underperforming...