• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Sri Lanka in New Zealand, 2024–25 (ODIs / T20Is)

Skyliner

International Debutant
Given Kane is essentially a de facto opener anyway I wouldn't worry too much about Ravindra opening in T20's. A lot of players who normally bat 4 or 5 in red ball cricket have successfully opened in limited overs.

Fisher played in the NZ XI game and if he has a good Super Smash will presumably get a call up at some stage.
Yup, obviously no other guys around that can open for is in T20’s so good that Rachin is doing it I suppose. 👍
 

ataraxia

International Coach
All I’ve said is that when Kane eventually retires we do need that ‘the sides best batsman’ person batting at 3 (sometimes they bat at 4) and Rachin is the obvious candidate. Every side has ‘that guy’ be it Steve Smith, Joe Root, Virat Kohli, Sachin Tendulkar, Greg Chappell, Martin Crowe. I don’t know what benefit there is in having Rachin open in T20 cricket but maybe there is some.
No. We don't. That's wrong. Ravindra should bat in a position in which he is suited. Don't pigeonhole him in to bat 3 in NZ if he's susceptible against the new ball!
 

Skyliner

International Debutant
No. We don't. That's wrong. Ravindra should bat in a position in which he is suited. Don't pigeonhole him in to bat 3 in NZ if he's susceptible against the new ball!
Righto, where do you see him settling in the batting order? Ultimately there are few places for a quality top order player to hide and you are expected to be able to cope with a newish ball. Batting down the order at 5 or 6 and you’ll more often than not come up against the second new ball.

I guess I’m a test cricket fan first and foremost so view everything through a lens of what will be good for our test side.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Righto, where do you see him settling in the batting order? Ultimately there are few places for a quality top order player to hide and you are expected to be able to cope with a newish ball. Batting down the order at 5 or 6 and you’ll more often than not come up against the second new ball.

I guess I’m a test cricket fan first and foremost so view everything through a lens of what will be good for our test side.
5 would be ideal IMO, but we're always staring down a shortness of top-order players and a heap of middle-order players. So he'll probably continue at 4.
 

King Kane

International Regular
Hopefully we get off to a better start than we did in the first T20, it would be hard to get off to a worse one.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Feeling lucky to be able to watch Tim Robinson bat this afternoon

Correct, to be able to have the privilege
 

King Kane

International Regular
Almost missing Allen opening such slow starts
If you had watched him playing for the Perth Scorchers in the Big Bash you wouldn't be saying that, he has been a dismal failure for them so far.

Seifert has been a much bigger success for the Melbourne Renegades at the top of their order,, we could do with him right now.

Robinson and Chapman aren't doing too badly here though, I'm glad they are giving Robinson a crack, he impressed me in the Super Smash.
 

Skyliner

International Debutant
All this failure as a T20 opener must be doing wonders for Rachin’s overall game. Nice one NZC. 👍 Pick Jacob’s and then don’t play him, trolling the fans once again. Nice one NZC. 👍
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
Mark Wood
I'm sure there's a whole bunch of them but no good example is coming immediately to mind. Iain O'Brien maybe? James Franklin (until he lost it again)?
Probably the best example I can think of is Flintoff who was 130kmh in the early days, but turned himself into 145+ in time for the 05 Ashes.
Maybe Kyle Jamieson too, though I think he put on 10 ks during the transition from first class to test cricket rather than after his international debut
all of these guys had a massive technical flaw which they fixed or obviously had massive headroom

Wood - was already hitting 145kph bowling off 10 paces, lengthened his run up and got on the juice (@RossTaylorsBox)
Flintoff - not super clued up on his early career but obviously had some headroom. Also famously had to redline it to bowl at full pace, rest of career plagued by injury as a result
Jamieson - cbf digging it up but Heinrich is on record saying all he did was tell Kyle to try harder

Foulkes already has a solid action and looks like he's putting in the effort you expect of a quick bowler - I don't think he can find 10kph out of nowhere (or without massively increasing injury risk)
 

Top