Grasshopper
State Vice-Captain
That was a ragged old batting effort, but they came back well with the ball. Great to see Bracewell make the most of his chance. Test cricket rocks.
Either sheer luck or from the pressure Southee built up.I've watched pretty much everything at home in the last year, and missed all our away series this year.
How come it tended to be Anderson or Wagner who took the breakthroughs with the old ball in that WI series then?
Southee still gives away too many singles.
Batsmen look to play more expansively against Wagner and Anderson due to the difficulty scoring off Southee therefore give more oppurtunities for wicketsI've watched pretty much everything at home in the last year, and missed all our away series this year.
How come it tended to be Anderson or Wagner who took the breakthroughs with the old ball in that WI series then?
Southee still gives away too many singles.
But conversely, he was outstanding on debut in Zimbabwe when no one else could buy one, and similarly good in Dunedin v SA. When he's rhythmical and hitting the crease hard, he hits back of a length as well as anyone - and that's obviously a key component in bowling well on flat ones.He's bowled well. The real test will be when he bowls on a flat deck, with an old ball, to set batsmen. He was woeful in Bangladesh, lets hope he has his plans sorted out.
What an absurd argument. The least you can do is admit Bracewell bowled well, which he did.lol, On a day where 15 wickets fell, you're claiming it as a moral victory that a bowler happened to take three of them - two of which rather fortunately. The beauty of "What if" is that you don't know, Wagner might have replicated his 5 wickets in one over on this wicket.
@ whoWhat an absurd argument. The least you can do is admit Bracewell bowled well, which he did.
Oh lord.lol, On a day where 15 wickets fell, you're claiming it as a moral victory that a bowler happened to take three of them - two of which rather fortunately. The beauty of "What if" is that you don't know, Wagner might have replicated his 5 wickets in one over on this wicket.
Yeah, he did bowl well - but he had conditions that obviously suited the bowlers. I still think Southee (as usual) was the pick of our boys, Bracewell just got the lucky wickets ( the chop on was a good ball, but lucky to hit the stumps, the lofted drive was just a **** shot )What an absurd argument. The least you can do is admit Bracewell bowled well, which he did.
Wagner does get swing, he was swinging the newish ball in the last game.What we do know is that Wagner wouldn't of found any swing and would of sprayed it at least as much as Bracewell.
Well, i did watch the odd session in the UAE and in the first game especially Southee struggled. At times he was downward garbage. The last game, yeah he bowled better than his figures suggest.Either sheer luck or from the pressure Southee built up.
He hasn't bowled well this innings but he was easily our best bowler in the Windies and the UAE without the rewards. He doesn't give away singles easily at all.
This may sound like fanboyism but you really had to watch him bowl over those tours. He's been every bit up there with Steyn and Harris. He's our MVP by a mile.
So why then was Doully harping on about Wagner not being able to swing the new ball?Wagner does get swing, he was swinging the newish ball in the last game.
Bracewell got a few to move, but most of his deliveries were gun barrel straight, the only thing you can say Bracewell generates that Wagner doesn't is more bounce from the pitch due to his into the wicket bowling style. I still think it was the wrong selection call, but I'm happy he's performing enough to give NZ a chance.