Sanz
Hall of Fame Member
I know, just disappointed, was looking forward to watch him.Starting the charge, nothing wrong with that.
I know, just disappointed, was looking forward to watch him.Starting the charge, nothing wrong with that.
I will be honest here, I have never watched Daniel bat in any form of cricket, He may be good But I am not going to watch him bat when we have Dravid and Laxman batting together.He looks great when he gets going doesn't he? Slaps the ball all over the ground off the back foot. So strange to see a modified cut going straight down the ground.
Thats ridiculous of you.I will be honest here, I have never watched Daniel bat in any form of cricket,
Precisely. The openers taking the spinners apart was a treat to watch.I have seen flatter wickets and yet not seen anyone bat like Sehwag and Gambhir did and it was very entertaining watching them bat on the first day.
Almost certainly all 3 will be blamed.Precisely. The openers taking the spinners apart was a treat to watch.
Besides, if the first Test in South Africa sees SA 400/2 at the end of day 1, will people blame crap bowling, good batting or the pitch being a road?
Athlai check out this match http://www.cricinfo.com/indvsl2009/engine/match/64023.html South Africa scored about 460 runs on the opening day but I don't think pitch was blamed in the report that followed. http://www.cricinfo.com/southafrica/content/story/127513.htmlAlmost certainly all 3 will be blamed.
Pakistan was the oppositin team and had Waqar Younis, Sami, Saqlain etc.Its England, it is bound to be the crap bowling.
That's my point though.Its England, it is bound to be the crap bowling.
Was not talking about that you silly little man.Pakistan was the oppositin team and had Waqar Younis, Sami, Saqlain etc.
yeah... coz Indian batsmen are duds..As opposed to Kumble when India were ambushed second test. But of course it’s Australia and South Africa’s fault for the benign surfaces being produced.
India given how poor their spin stocks are can no longer get away with preparing square turners, only if they are facing the likes of South Africa. Sri Lanka would dick them, even with Murali being close to finished, Herath being a hack and Mendis decoded. And they would have lost the first test by an innings if Sri Lanka had anything close to a decent seam attack.
You posted directly below my post. So i assumed that dear old fellow!Was not talking about that you silly little man.
Again.. the classic case of deciding something is good or bad from scorecards than by actual experience... So the chennai pitch against England last year was a cracker, wasn't it?Australian pitches tend to bring results though, for whatever reason. It's just as easy to score runs but they're not so painfully slow. There's nothing worse than seeing a bowler take the batsman's edge time and time again only for it to drop short of first slip.
In any case, it's always good to reserve judgment of a pitch until both teams have batted. But I'm not optimistic.
yep.. judge a pitch by results.. Let us all conveniently forget that the quality of the players playing on the said strip is what actually decides whether there is a result in the game or not.. Brilliant...All true, but nonetheless, if the results are still coming then there isn't a problem that particularly needs to be fixed. Once we get test series ending in 0-0 draws in Australia then it'll be fair to give their ground staff an earful.
There is generally some pace and decent bounce, too. Rarely see such a slow pitch in Australia, except perhaps at Adelaide.