Stapel
International Regular
Too late anyway, I think. I would have started slogging possibly even yesterday.Declaration time?
Maybe the declaration will come when Prasanna makes 150?
Too late anyway, I think. I would have started slogging possibly even yesterday.Declaration time?
Yeah, you could say that.Actually couldn't help notice that the Indian bowler's in general have rubbish test averages which to me really emphasizes the pitches they generally play on & suggests to me that their batsmen's averages flatter to deceive
Thats what home and away averages are for.Actually couldn't help notice that the Indian bowler's in general have rubbish test averages which to me really emphasizes the pitches they generally play on & suggests to me that their batsmen's averages flatter to deceive
Can't say I've seen the pitch, but surely Murali could be a factor in the last 130-140 overs or so with the added pressure of the big deficit for the Indian'sit's sad india continues to produce these kinds of wickets. no wonder there pace bowling stocks are so weak. who would want to bowl on these highways?
Yeah. There are result pitches available too. But they get games during 3 or 5 match test series. Delhi, Mumbai etc for example.it's sad india continues to produce these kinds of wickets. no wonder there pace bowling stocks are so weak. who would want to bowl on these highways?
Just 9 runs off the last 4 overs ....you'd think they'd step it up given they're not declaringYeah. There are result pitches available too. But they get games during 3 or 5 match test series. Delhi, Mumbai etc for example.
Shame that the Chennai pitch has become a road in recent times as well. Was a really good test wicket in the 90s.
And as I say that, they get 11 off the next over ...that's more like itJust 9 runs off the last 4 overs ....you'd think they'd step it up given they're not declaring
Disagree with this. I've seen nothing over the years that suggest India suit sprightly wickets in anyway whatsoever. Of course the classic example going back a few years was their tour of NZ in 2002 (admittedly 7 yrs ago) when they had that supposed million dollar batting lineup & were all at sea against an relatively average NZ attack on those green decks.The BCCI needs to step in and curb these state boards from preparing flat pitches. It's not so much the match getting boring- the Indian team is genuinely vulnerable on flat decks. No matter how many the Indians score, the opposition outscore them, often scoring enough to force adequate pressure to win the game. India's batsmen on dodgy wickets are far better than their bowlers on flat decks with no assistance. Every team has a home advantage with the kind of pitch and possibly outfield, but the Indians have no advantage whatsoever on a flat deck.
Won on a touch pitch, lost on a flat track in South Africa.Disagree with this. I've seen nothing over the years that suggest India suit sprightly wickets in anyway whatsoever. Of course the classic example going back a few years was their tour of NZ in 2002 (admittedly 7 yrs ago) when they had that supposed million dollar batting lineup & were all at sea against an relatively average NZ attack on those green decks.
Of course you may point to their series against NZ earlier this year, but NZ test pitches have generally been flat for around 4-5 years now, and that series was no exception.
Also, as far as I remember, their test wins in Aust in the last few years were played on flat-decks.
All that said, I haven't followed the Indian test side that closely over the last 2-3 years, so happy to be corrected if you can point out when they've done well on green/seaming/dodgy pitches against decent opposition
Touch pitch? Where was that & what year?Won on a touch pitch, lost on a flat track in South Africa.
Scorecard certainly suggests a dodgy wicket granted, but nothing in the scorecards of the 2nd & 3rd tests suggest particularly flat decks to me