sirjeremy11
State Vice-Captain
Bashar wins the toss and bats first. Good luck tigers.
Add Prasad to that too, but then again we have to respect Bangla a little, you can't just send a A side against expect to win. You are pretty much asking to lose.JASON said:I am disappointed in the SL Team Management for failing to give Kapugedera and Weerakoon their frst Test caps .
They could've dropped Murali or Bandara and given Weerakoon a go. Likewise Dilshan or Samaraweera could've made way for Kapugedera .
Another instance of SL selectors missing an opportunity to blood a couple of promising youngsters !!
Does it really matter even if we lost if we played some youngsters ?chaminda_00 said:Add Prasad to that too, but then again we have to respect Bangla a little, you can't just send a A side against expect to win. You are pretty much asking to lose.
Yes it would cus these youngsters would be seen as scapegoats. "Your not good enough to play Test Cricket cus you couldn't even beat Bangladesh" Also Weerakoon is not really a youngster, 28yo.JASON said:Does it really matter even if we lost if we played some youngsters ?
BTW I really doubt they would lose if they played Weerakoon for Bandara and Kapugedera for Dilshan . There would be still enough experience in the Team .
Interesting to note that the filter thinks that's an offensive word !!andyc said:Ooohh
Nigh****chman Bandara out, Sri Lanka 2/13.
Edit: I thought nigh****chman had been taken out of the filter
wonder if it's ever happened in test cricket ?shaka said:double play finish
Murali is a champion against Bangla , but can he do the same against tougher opposition ie.Pakistan later in the month ?alternative said:Murali picks up his 598th test wicket, with that he has also reached his 50th five wicket haul.. congrats murali..
AMAZING STATS.alternative said:Murali picks up his 598th test wicket, with that he has also reached his 50th five wicket haul.. congrats murali..
Despite being a Sri Lankan, I have little doubt that Murali owes a lot of his success to playing most of his Tests at home and this coupled with his playing more tests against weaker opposition has no doubt helped him accelerate and get there pretty quickly.SJS said:AMAZING STATS.
598 (will surely get his 600 in this game) in his 101st test match !
A five-for once every two test matches !!
Could this guy end up with a thousand test wickets ?
In the last six calendar years (2000 to 2005) he has taken 357 wickets and he has missed a few games too.
He will be 34 this April. Its not an impossibilty.
The mind boggles.
He does do better against the minnows (naturally) but he has an amazing record againt non-minnows too. In the last six calendar years hw has (other than against Zim and BD) 253 wickets in 41 tests at 22.00 each - better than his career average against all comers !!JASON said:Murali is a champion against Bangla , but can he do the same against tougher opposition ie.Pakistan later in the month ?
But those Tests against non-minnows were mostly played at home rather than away , that obviously helps !!SJS said:He does do better against the minnows (naturally) but he has an amazing record againt non-minnows too. In the last six calendar years hw has (other than against Zim and BD) 253 wickets in 41 tests at 22.00 each - better than his career average against all comers !!
Thats six wickets (almost) a test still.
And he has 24 five-fors in these 41 tests, thats much better than his career rate of one in two !!
Tha is perhaps true to an extent but even then his figures are mind boggling unless we assume that there is a non cricketing element that helps him at home.JASON said:But those Tests against non-minnows were mostly played at home rather than away , that obviously helps !!