How does banning CSA from having international events achieve this?Logically transforming the grass roots of SA sport to include black Africans is the best thing for the country. Will get much bigger pool of players to pick from.
If there's demand for a sport people will play it.Football met their targets but still got slapped for not doing enough in introducing football into the former model c afrikaans skools.
And Jip definitely an election strategy. Trying to shift focus from nkandla,ect...
Who has said that that is a bad thing?Logically transforming the grass roots of SA sport to include black Africans is the best thing for the country. Will get much bigger pool of players to pick from.
Spot on.The problem is not the transformation policy itself... its the implementation thereof. It helps nothing to demand more players of colour in the national side, when government does not help fund schools and club level sports correctly. They can`t even get the basics of textbooks in schools right. But they use this sort of headline to make political statements rather than sorting out the root problems first.
Not good!If they want 60% thats 7 players then.The Yarpies will get smashed.
And Rabada is not even from an underprivileged background. His old man is a doctor and he went to St Stithians. I think transformation imperatives meant he got opportunities he wouldn't have had if he was white (he would have played for SA at some point no matter the colour of his skin).Not good!
I have no problem with 90% players of colour, I would love to increase the talent pool. Rabada is a perfect example of what could be, but there its just not enough players of colour available yet for a myriad of political and social reasons that needs to be dealt with at lower levels.
a Private school is hardly middle class. None of the cricketers can really be classed as middle class as 90% of those who made it to the national team attended private schools.And Rabada is not even from an underprivileged background. His old man is a doctor and he went to St Stithians. I think transformation imperatives meant he got opportunities he wouldn't have had if he was white (he would have played for SA at some point no matter the colour of his skin).
Ntini is an example of grassroots transformation, while Rabada is a middle class fellow, who has had as many opportunities as white players of the same age.
My point still stands though. Only on historical grounds can Rabada (and Bavuma for that matter) be considered disadvantaged.a Private school is hardly middle class. None of the cricketers can really be classed as middle class as 90% of those who made it to the national team attended private schools.
Yeah, he wood not have had those opportunities in Apartheid SA regardless of his upbringing... but he is not from an underprivileged background himself. He was not even on a scholarship.And Rabada is not even from an underprivileged background. His old man is a doctor and he went to St Stithians. I think transformation imperatives meant he got opportunities he wouldn't have had if he was white (he would have played for SA at some point no matter the colour of his skin).
Ntini is an example of grassroots transformation, while Rabada is a middle class fellow, who has had as many opportunities as white players of the same age.
I think a lot of the cricketers can be classed as middle class as many of the top sportsman would have been given scholarships as soon as they showed their talents.a Private school is hardly middle class. None of the cricketers can really be classed as middle class as 90% of those who made it to the national team attended private schools.
I don't think there is. I actually read an article recently about how most Indian cricketers are from upper-catse backgrounds and Dalits/former Untouchables struggle to make their way as porofessional cricketers, because of the continued prejudice against them.I would love to know what the Indian supporters think of this as they in essence (even if not via the same history) have a similar economic disparity amongst there population. Is there any discussion like this to try fix the problems(if there is one considered)... I say this as very much a non-expert in India, so please take it from an ignorant standpoint.
Mixed reaction, many black players (or players of colour) feel that there is still barriers... and that may very well be true, but also some dislike being called quota players (Amla was initially in his career called this, Bavuma is treated this way now by people who don`t know better). So I think it depends on personal experience for them...Did you guys ever findout how black South Africans feel about this decision?