Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Have you ignored every other post where I called for his head? And have you read the post that that was responding to? Does context mean nothing to you? All interesting questions I'm sure.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* South Africa in West Indies
- Thread starter James
- Start date
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
You're not having a series of 40 different arguments here. You're arguing one point and there a group of others arguing the contrary. Nobody is speaking on behalf of one another.Excuse me are you a Moderator?i don't see the tag so until then i'll post in whatever style i like thanks!!.
Anyway, try reading the entire thread before replying, means people don't have to say the same things more than once and you don't have to make points which have already been answered.
Better?
WindieWeathers
International Regular
Erm unlike you i didn't actually SAY that Swann played against England like you did with Harris and South Africa!!, so you're failing right there i'm afraid!!
.
Jarquis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Basically what WW wants to hear is
Benn is the only spin bowler to face England, Australia and South Africa in the last 18 months, thus he's the best bowler in the world.
Wickets against those 3 nations are obviously inifintely harder to take than those of other nations. Oh and bowlers who are either Australian, English or South African are exempt as they obviously haven't played against their own countries.
Benn is the only spin bowler to face England, Australia and South Africa in the last 18 months, thus he's the best bowler in the world.
Wickets against those 3 nations are obviously inifintely harder to take than those of other nations. Oh and bowlers who are either Australian, English or South African are exempt as they obviously haven't played against their own countries.
WindieWeathers
International Regular
Jarquis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
In as many words...Erm unlike you i didn't actually SAY that Swann played against England like you did with Harris and South Africa!!, so you're failing right there i'm afraid!!
You said that you weren't surprised that Swann's record against England, South Africa and Australia was better than Benn's.
Jarquis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
No he's making sense.Typical response Mr M!!, you got caught out so you start making excuses!!
Ironically a concept you don't understand.
Jarquis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
You're not having a series of 40 different arguments here. You're arguing one point and there a group of others arguing the contrary. Nobody is speaking on behalf of one another.
Anyway, try reading the entire thread before replying, means people don't have to say the same things more than once and you don't have to make points which have already been answered.
Better?
WAG. z
Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Because knowledge is power.Typical response Mr M!!
WindieWeathers
International Regular
If they were making 500 plus runs every innings you'd have a point, but we had them 107/5 and 123/5 due largely to the spin and we bowled them out for 350 twice!!, which isn't bad at all, if the other top sides had done that i'm sure they would be happy because they have the batting power to make SA pay for it, we on the other hand didn't.
WindieWeathers
International Regular
So now you're distorting my words?!!
i was talking about the list, at no stage did i mention Swann and England, please try and fathom that as this debate is getting boring!!.
WindieWeathers
International Regular
Another one talking for others?!!
goodness me you lot could start a band soon!!.. call it "the mouthpieces"!! .
Last edited:
WindieWeathers
International Regular
I'm only quoting YOUR OWN WORDS Mr M, you were making excuses for Ramdin, something which you've had a history of doing in the past, there's no need to deny it man you're only digging yourself a bigger hole!!
.
Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Okay, you've been warned about antagonising. It's a public forum. If you want to have private conversations, do it elsewhere please. All discussions on public CW forums are just that. Anyone can participate, once conducting him/herself in an acceptable way. And yes, Marcuss has.Another one talking for others?!!
Your equivalent of "butt out" is not valid here.
Jarquis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Talking about stats against England, Australia and South Africa.
See it yet? See it yet?"Most" being the obvious one's such as Swann, Mishra and Singh? well what a surprise!!
Last edited:
akilana
International 12th Man
I give you that he's done well against SA in 'this' series but his overall record or past one year isn't very impressive. He took wicket every 80 balls. I won't read much into his performance against a team you described as inept at facing spinners before the test series. Looking at his record, I can see he's improving..
WindieWeathers
International Regular
I asked if he was "a moderator", not if he was "a biased moderator"!!You're not having a series of 40 different arguments here. You're arguing one point and there a group of others arguing the contrary. Nobody is speaking on behalf of one another.
Anyway, try reading the entire thread before replying, means people don't have to say the same things more than once and you don't have to make points which have already been answered.
Better?
.
Jarquis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well I suggest you take your own advice and check the tag.I asked if he was "a moderator", not if he was "a biased moderator"!!
Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Didn't know that. That's very interesting. Considering success against NZ, WI and Bangladesh is being asked to be excluded from a discussion that welcomes an "inept" team.
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Biased moderators are still moderators. Just as rubbish spinners are still spinners.I asked if he was "a moderator", not if he was "a biased moderator"!!
