personally i would have had nel in for hayward, although hayward hasnt been half as wayward as he has been in the past.Nikhil4eva said:*GC Smith, HH Dippenaar, JA Rudolph, JH Kallis, M van Jaarsveld,+MV Boucher, SM Pollock, L Klusener, N Boje, M Ntini, M Hayward.
actually it was a brilliant piece of swing bowling from pollock that induced the shot. it was an excellent opening spell from pollock in the conditions and i find it hard to understand why graeme smith didnt bowl him just after lunch when jayawardhene wasnt set. and when he did bowl he bowled to defensive fields with only one slip.Craig said:Typical Marvan Atapattu, all or nothing, Langeveldt considers him to be under-rated why?
Good to see Nantie Hayward return to Test cricket.
poor shot....he was done in by the in swing that pollock was getting.Nikhil4eva said:Sanath gone....pollock picks up the first wicket as sri lanka are 13/1
So Pollock CAN take wickets then with dangerous bowling, rather than just be economical?tooextracool said:actually it was a brilliant piece of swing bowling from pollock that induced the shot. it was an excellent opening spell from pollock in the conditions and i find it hard to understand why graeme smith didnt bowl him just after lunch when jayawardhene wasnt set. and when he did bowl he bowled to defensive fields with only one slip.
yes he can especially when there is a bit of movement around as there was early on in the day.Tom Halsey said:So Pollock CAN take wickets then with dangerous bowling, rather than just be economical?
donno if zee TV is shown in europe...anyway thanks mate...cheersdude said:nookie do you have zee tv? its on zee here in the states. or www.willow.tv
gonna be a close match IF sri lanka gets 350JASON said:Sri Lanka likely to get around 350 (Although this depends on Vaas and allrounder Maharoof trying to stay around with Jayawardene, especially with the new ball being only 9 overs old).
Having said that Australia won the Galle Test after conceding a first innings lead of over 150.