henry didn't do well in the tests, no. In ODIs henry's been shafted a bit though. Played a couple of poor games in aus where everyone got pumped and now apparently southee is permanent again. Other than that he's been consistently our second best ODI pacer in the past couple of years.Isn't bowling all that badly and we have no quicks knocking the door down. I guess he has Henry to thank really.
Never know, the Boult drop could be crucial ....53 off 31 with two capable batsmen.Dead.... SA lolapse.
Stop countering my Gambhiring....Never know, the Boult drop could be crucial ....53 off 31 with two capable batsmen.
Fair and I still think he's often a better ODI new ball bowler than Southee. Southee is a better bowler at the death (or past the 30 over mark on a road) though is by no means great there. Henry would still be in my squad for the CT in England.henry didn't do well in the tests, no. In ODIs henry's been shafted a bit though. Played a couple of poor games in aus where everyone got pumped and now apparently southee is permanent again. Other than that he's been consistently our second best ODI pacer in the past couple of years.