Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Well, maybe because it might mean others didn't perform to the levels we hope for from them?Why would you fear that?
Obviously, there'd not be a lot else to complain about with such a thing.
Well, maybe because it might mean others didn't perform to the levels we hope for from them?Why would you fear that?
1. r u sure abt Motera's ability to produce nice, quick and bouncy turners?TBH, I see SA being worried far more by Harbhajan on a turner than Ishant on a green, bouncy surface.
And equally, South Africa's seam-attack remains more powerful than India's. India backing their seamers would be a dangerous move.
IMO, especially given Motera and The Chepauk Stadium tend to produce very nice, quick, bouncy turners, India would be mad to go for anything but spin.
And for mine, Zaheer and RP have to play. They are undoubtedly India's premier seam-bowlers in the longer form of the game currently.
The only other alternative would be having Dravid (or even Tendulkar or Ganguly) open, and picking 5 bowlers. But I hate the idea of any of the middle-order opening, personally, and Jaffer still has credit in the bank for my money, too. I want to see what he's really made of, I want conclusive evidence of whether he's Test-class or not. Facing Steyn with the new-ball would (hopefully) be another stern test.
Well the most recent game there, against Sri Lanka in 2005\06, certainly seemed to offer such a thing. The only other game I've taken note of (watched, in fact) was against England in 2001\02, and this started with good bounce but disappointingly got lower and slower as the game progressed.1. r u sure abt Motera's ability to produce nice, quick and bouncy turners?
in test matches, as the game progresses, the pitch has the tendency to get lower and slower .... which not only makes scoring difficult but also picking up wkts .... let's hope that the pitch turns out like you described in ur earlier postWell the most recent game there, against Sri Lanka in 2005\06, certainly seemed to offer such a thing. The only other game I've taken note of (watched, in fact) was against England in 2001\02, and this started with good bounce but disappointingly got lower and slower as the game progressed.
There's also a game against South Africa in 1996\97 that seems to have been of that ilk too.
As well as 2 games, both against New Zealand, which consisted of pitches that were absurdly flat.
Sometimes it happens that way, sometimes it becomes more uneven, with some keeping low and some popping up. The former makes scoring and picking-up wickets difficult; the latter makes scoring difficult and picking-up wickets easier.in test matches, as the game progresses, the pitch has the tendency to get lower and slower .... which not only makes scoring difficult but also picking up wkts
Yeah, that was one of the games I mentioned.usually, at Motera it's Indian victory or draw, I particularly liked the test [link here], where Laxman played superbly on his test debut, i i m not wrong, and then Srinath destroyed the opposition .... For me, it was the first time, i saw an Indian fast bowler destroy the oposition as usually it's the spinners who do that
Shame you can't spell though.Threads merged, allthough thanks to my awesomeness, we've kept the official title.
Nothing.... has been adviced 2 week rest...should be okay for the seriesTendulkar? What's happened to him?!
I guess you haven't seen too much of DK as a keeper........IMO his glovework in this series in Australia has been far superior to anything Kartik has shown so far. So he would automatically be in the team as the number 1 WK in India.
Unless he has injuries.
Making up creatively for the fact that neither Pathan would make it as a specialist bowler and that either Pathan + 1 Kumble + 3 bowlers are a weak batting orderJust to create some debate, let's assume that Tendulkar, Yuvraj, Harbhajan and Ishant miss out along with Zaheer. What should the side look like?
Jaffer, Sehwag, Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly, Dhoni, Pathan, Pathan, Kumble, Sreesanth, RP Singh
Or bring in Badrinath/Kaif/Raina and Kartik/Powar (even though YKP has outdone both with the ball in recent times) for the Pathan brothers. Thoughts?
Flat and slow = not too problematic.If the wickets are anything like the ones predicted then I don’t South Africa will be too disturbed. They are essentially pretty flat and South Africa are now more vulnerable to good pace bowling than there are to spinners or slow, low wickets. Pakistan thought they could beat them by preparing such tracks and they got beaten whilst Bangladesh keep thinking South Africans are not good players of spin and keep get humiliating.
India last won a test against South Africa’s thanks to their seamers on a greenish surface why not try the same tactic at home? For when they did play on a flat, low surface (Indian like) in Cape Town they lost.
i guess, Ten is available for the Ist test .... any word on the availability of others?Just to create some debate, let's assume that Tendulkar, Yuvraj, Harbhajan and Ishant miss out along with Zaheer. What should the side look like?