Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Play Jaffer FFS.So what m i suppose to do with that
Play Jaffer FFS.So what m i suppose to do with that
If Sreesanth could probe the line and length, as I mentioned in an above post, that attack could be fantastic. Five bowlers could allow Ishant Sharma and Sreesanth to bowl at the 140kph pace which they both have the ability to hit whereas Praveen Kumar could have an ability to bowl with the new ball without becoming a liability later in the innings (since there will be four other bowlers to share the load with). From what I have seen of Praveen Kumar, he is a bully of poor bowling and someone who exploits small boundaries and so is not deserving of his FC batting average.
- Sehwag
- Jaffer
- Dravid
- Laxman
- Ganguly
- Dhoni
- Kumble
- Kumar
- Harbhajan
- Sharma
- Sreesanth
The tail is long, but Kumble and Kumar both average 20+ in FC cricket.
just coz some think that Ganguly is not suitable to open and Yuvi lacks talentPlay Jaffer FFS.
So what m i suppose to do with that
I don't understand the rolling eyes. Why would Ganguly be a good opener in Tests and what has Yubi done in Tests to show that he is a Test batsman?just coz some think that Ganguly is not suitable to open and Yuvi lacks talent
what i m implying is that it's your problem that you think that he is unsuitable duhHere's a clue: if he is so unsuitable (and he is), don't make him open.
A good Q .... I just wrote a long post a while ago but that had Tendulkar in itI don't understand the rolling eyes. Why would Ganguly be a good opener in Tests and what has Yubi done in Tests to show that he is a Test batsman?
He went through a period in 2006/7 where he made a noticeable effort to keep the bowling arm straighter. However, this resulted in a severe lack of overspin (and so, dip) and side spin - it also made him bowl flatter. Consequently, he has reverted back to his old bowling action.Ive not seen him bowl for a while. Is this common or has it developed more recently?
It was good there in the middle, but it has gotten bad lately again.Saw little of this Test apart from extended highlights of the 2nd day.
Was obviously an amazing knock by Sehwag and there was a little more drama than usual in a bore draw.
I have to say though that Im finding Harbhajans action verging on the sickening. IMO, he chucked every ball I saw, not just the overspun ball or the doosra. Highlights was the best way to see this as his balls were spliced between guys with straight arms (such as Sehwag and Kumble) and the straightening is considerable and noticable.
Ive not seen him bowl for a while. Is this common or has it developed more recently?
Umm Jaffer OTOH scored a fluent double ton against Pakistan to more than match Yuvraj's 169. Not only are you substituting an inferior test player in swapping Yuvraj for Jaffer, but you are also meesing with another middle order test player by shoving Ganguly to open.You could say that but I have more faith in Yuvi's talent than Jaffar's .... Yuvi's last test in Ind was pretty good as well .... and if you didn't get a 50 at Chennai on that pitch then you obviously did badly
Kumar is not in the squad, Pathan is and he averages close to 30 in tests and FC.Yuvi has no talent in Tests. Or, he hasn't given us any hints that he has it. Jaffer has two double centuries. I'd much rather back someone like Badrinath than Yuvraj. Badrinath could quite possibly be in the best batsman in the world who has not played a Test.
- Sehwag
- Jaffer
- Dravid
- Laxman
- Ganguly
- Dhoni
- Kumble
- Kumar
- Harbhajan
- Sharma
- Sreesanth
The tail is long, but Kumble and Kumar both average 20+ in FC cricket.
Haha I read this the first time referring to Harbhajan's on-field antics, and the sentence still made sense.I have to say though that Im finding Harbhajans action verging on the sickening.
dude, haven't i made it clear in my million posts above that I rate Yuvi highly than JaffarUmm Jaffer OTOH scored a fluent double ton against Pakistan to more than match Yuvraj's 169. Not only are you substituting an inferior test player in swapping Yuvraj for Jaffer, but you are also meesing with another middle order test player by shoving Ganguly to open.
The series in Australia should have taught us this. Not only did Yuvraj himself fail miserably, mucking aruond with the batting lineup to force fit him also resulted in other players being sub-par (in that series , Dravid took the brunt. Now you are making Ganguly do that).
If you have faith in Yuvraj's abilities as a test player, then ask him to take a sabbatical from ODIs for a year, play county and domestic first class - set those worlds on fire and then be ready for test responsibilities in that time.
Problem with dead tracks and weak laws - make/allow you to get way with anythingSickening is maybe the wrong word. I do remember watching and thinking "WTF, how is this guy allowed to bowl?, its not even near legal" though.
Bottom line is that, for India at least, this test posed more questions than answers.dude, haven't i made it clear in my million posts above that I rate Yuvi highly than Jaffar
2ndly, what happens when Tendulkar comes in at Kanpur? There will be the same Q that I raised here about playing specialist opener + big 4 Or big 4 + bowling all-rounder
below are my original top 7:
- Sehwag
- Ganguly
- Dravid
- Tendulkar [Yuvi replaces him at A'bad] and then Sachin comes back at Kanpur
- Laxman
- Dhoni
- Pathan