Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It was all a very long time ago i suppose.There was no way to tell that Jones would go on to be better than Flintoff after the Ashes. Remember Flintoff was brilliant in that series too and had already proven that he could bowl effectively outside of England. Jones had, at that stage, not proven any such thing. It's one thing to steam in and swing the ball a mile when you're pumped up on adrenaline in an Ashes Test in front of one of the most engaged and vibrant audiences in the history of English cricket. That, particularly when you're the celebrity-prone type that Jones appears to be. It's entirely another to perform when momentum is not on your side.
You talk as though Flintoff did not prove himself after he matured into a quality bowler. The fact is that, when Flintoff went down, he had established himself as world class. Jones had done no such thing. I'm as big a fan of the guy as any non-English/Welshman, but Flintoff > Jones.
I'll put it another way. Flintoff hasn't bowled in a very long time, and i'm not entirely sure of whether he'll ever reach the standard he was at. Jones has done a lot more to prove that he's still a quality bowler, and while he played for England, he was at Flintoff's level- if over a much shorter period of time.
It's a bit like if i were to say Dale Steyn is a better test bowler than Shaun Pollock. Probably true at the moment, but not at all true in the terms you're thinking of.