Reminds me of England is Aus in our darkest days. Admittedly SA are missing Smith & Kallis, but even so ....cameeel said:End of Day's Play: WA v Sth. Africa
WA: 8-391 (dec)
Voges 101
North 71
Bandy 64
Langeveldt 4-104
Sth. A: 179 & 2-12
Rudolph 43 & 7
Casson 4-21 & 0-3
Gillies 3-41
Edmondson 3-48 & 1-16
I think not!Five years ago South Africa may have been tipped as favourites to win this series.
Big call... but will they all even play? Nel, Pollock and Ntini definately will, but Langeveldt might be left out and Kallis might pull out injured. Kallis' bowling is poor these days anyway.our pace attack is the best in the world (no really, Nel, Langeveld, Ntini, Pollock, Kallis... you can't get any better)
What do you mean by "survive?"Remember, Australia have a lot more to lose than SA in this series... Do you really think Australian cricket would survive another series defeat (especially at home!?)
Yeah, but the batting looks a bit weak in general to me. Smith, Gibbs and Kallis are fine, but you cant just rely on those three. De Villiers has looked in awful form in the tour matches, and I think his inexperience may cost against him. The remaining two batting spots, likely to be filled with Prince and Rudolph, are where the concerns are really prominant. They are solid players, but they arent players that I can really see worrying the likes of McGrath and Warne. If either of them average above 30 in the series Ill be shocked. Boucher just isnt up to it with the bat anymore IMO.Well, we may have lost Gary Kirsten, but gained a tallented Greame Smith
Yeah agreed. This kind of stuff is good publicity for the series and adds to what could be a decent contest.Slow Love™ said:This crap from the ICC is really lame, IMO. For god's sake, punish the people who are breaking the laws of conduct on the field, but leave this kind of harmless verbal sparring pre-series alone. What on earth's wrong with it? "We're gonna target their middle order"... "We'll sweep Warne"... "They'll need a shrink when we've finished with them.". Honestly, is that really anything to be worried about?
As much as I hope it is, I can't see this series being competitive. If S.A. can't smash any form of a W.A. side, what hope do they have against Australia?Blaze said:Yeah agreed. This kind of stuff is good publicity for the series and adds to what could be a decent contest.
I would rate the English attack a lot better than this one. With Harmison, Flintoff, Jones and the underrated Hoggard. Pollock is way past his best and is pretty average at the moment. Ntini is a great bowler and world class. Langeveld hasn't done enough to warrant too much appraisal and Nel is too inconsistent. And Im Australian so there is no bias involved.Dean said:our pace attack is the best in the world (no really, Nel, Langeveld, Ntini, Pollock, Kallis... you can't get any better),