benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Clarke dropped by Ishant on 182.
Will it hurt them??
Will it hurt them??
Ha, fair dos.Not 100% but I'd suggest the time-tested 'who would you share a roadie/coldie with?' criteria saw Quiney get the nod over Rogers.
Correct decision, tbh.
Fair comments.Well, as the only card-carrying member of the Dean Jones Fan Club on this forum, this is quite hard for me to say but I think he only played that many because there was a dearth of top batting talent at the time (much like now, really). I notice the selectors took the first opportunity to turf him against the WI once some young guns came along, despite a good record against that team and coming off a great series in SL. I raged against it at the time, of course, but no doubt he was a **** and not a great team-man.
Guess it depends on the circumstances, really. My opinion, to pick a difficult character right now, they'd surely have to be absolutely on fire with the blade and have the ability to lift everyone around him. In the absence of that, I think going the 'team first' route is the way to go because they're going to have to bat in partnerships against this Saffer attack because they're going to be all over them.
It was tough on Jones to be dropped after topping the averages when M.Waugh scored two successive pairs in same series. Maybe that's why this has translated into a bitterness which results in obsessive references to Madras.Dropped in 1988 for Veletta. Then dropped in 1992 for Martyn. At least the latter dropping was more fair, shouldve been M Waugh dropped in 1992 after SL tour, he was dropped already in 1992 for the Perth test vs India (Deano got 151*).
Justin Langer wrote the last one in crayon tbf.
Pretty sure he was born with a bitter taste in his mouth, tbh.It was tough on Jones to be dropped after topping the averages when M.Waugh scored two successive pairs in same series. Maybe that's why this has translated into a bitterness which results in obsessive references to Madras.
Amla's venerable to the short ball? I'm surprised no other test team in the last 5 years has figured this out.
Mind you that does not mean it was a good decision the guy averaged mid 40's during a time when the fast bowling standards were pretty good.Also the likes of Langer and Martyn showed they were not ready for the step up for another 5 years and whether early tastes to test cricket helped them develop as test cricketers is also up for debate.Well, as the only card-carrying member of the Dean Jones Fan Club on this forum, this is quite hard for me to say but I think he only played that many because there was a dearth of top batting talent at the time (much like now, really). I notice the selectors took the first opportunity to turf him against the WI once some young guns came along, despite a good record against that team and coming off a great series in SL. I raged against it at the time, of course, but no doubt he was a **** and not a great team-man.