• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** South Africa in Australia 2012

Spark

Global Moderator
Then why isn't it?

If this was a limited overs scenario they wouldn't 'settle' for this, so why do it in a Test match?

This mentality drives me up the wall. Maximise your chance of winning the bloody game. Throw all traditions and other baggage out of the window.
There's now appreciable sideways movement regularly and hints of variable bounce. Hardly easy.

EDIT: Haha, that was coming.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Then why isn't it?

If this was a limited overs scenario they wouldn't 'settle' for this, so why do it in a Test match?

This mentality drives me up the wall. Maximise your chance of winning the bloody game. Throw all traditions and other baggage out of the window.
The plan might be 4 an over and then 6 over for the last 5/6 overs or something like that. We are batting quite well this morning, the pitch is doing a fair bit this morning - you watching?
 

hazsa19

International Regular
Then why isn't it?

If this was a limited overs scenario they wouldn't 'settle' for this, so why do it in a Test match?

This mentality drives me up the wall. Maximise your chance of winning the bloody game. Throw all traditions and other baggage out of the window.
Well in one day cricket the white ball is usually going gun barrel straight, and the bloke bowling it is a 'bits and pieces' player who has no place in the Test Match arena.

I guess they would rather stick in and secure that 150 lead, rather than swish about for a bit and lose all their capable batsmen for a few runs.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Yeah its a little annoying to see Wade's match awareness not look too sharp so far. Hopefully he's just thought 8-10 balls to get his eyes in and then start batting aggressively.

Its one of the reasons why Gilchrist was superb, pretty sure he'd be making a run a ball cameo in this situation.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well in one day cricket the white ball is usually going gun barrel straight, and the bloke bowling it is a 'bits and pieces' player who has no place in the Test Match arena.

I guess they would rather stick in and secure that 150 lead, rather than swish about for a bit and lose all their capable batsmen for a few runs.
Come on folks if this was a T20 match would you be seriously suggesting this is a sub-100 pitch? Not a bloody chance. It's not like South Africa are bowling it a foot outside leg with most of the field on the boundary either (exploiting Test regulations to be overly defensive).

I hope Australia piss about some more and they get down to one of the tailenders who slogs a quick 20-30. But you lot will continue to parade this **** about how it's really tricky to score when they've shown the bare minimum of intent with 1-2 scoring shots an over. The approach is all wrong.

Ignore all the preconceptions, the history of the way teams have pissed about before declaring and think about it rationally.

Australia needed about another 150 or so runs today. They needed 50 or so in the morning to reduce any later chase to a formality (besides the fact they'd have to score quickly). If Australia were chasing 50 with 6-7 overs left and 4 wickets down do you think they'd manage it? I reckon so. 8-9 overs would be a formality right.

They've gone at 4 an over so far today.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Kleinveldt reminds me of Nel a little bit. Not quite as front-on as him, but big bustling type with arms and legs everywhere.
 

Top