Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Can't unsign Fitzsimmons and put him up for bid again. I wouldn't be opposed to allowing Green a top draft pick on the current unsigned duo though. Certainly need it more than CW Black.
Thought it was pretty obvious that it would prevent Green from being screwed over.The system isn't about screwing Black over, much as you'd like it to be.
Don't see how that comes up. Green were first in the order and never actually signed someone so in fact it was Green who got screwed over.The system isn't about screwing Black over, much as you'd like it to be.
Will have to discuss this with the CWBCC.Would prefer Raftery since he's now a batsman and Scotty isn't too active IMO.
Thank youTharmi, if you're going to talk about the green captaincy you should probably be informed that it's GARVEN, not Graven.
Scotty didn't agree to be signed and therefore he was not signed by Green. Also Garven only expressed interest in Scotty. He never officially offered him a contract. The fact is that the CWBCC accidentally overlooked that and took the word of Green having signed Scotty as true.Does seem Black are treated a tad unfairly due to current management issues at Green. Graven asked to sign Scotty, so I can't see how that isn't an offically signing unless Graven authority as captain has been taken away.
I thought we were talking about some sort of instant home made gravy brand, TBH.Tharmi, if you're going to talk about the green captaincy you should probably be informed that it's GARVEN, not Graven.
We all know i'm just here to give the spelling nazi something to post about. Sorry Age btw.Tharmi, if you're going to talk about the green captaincy you should probably be informed that it's GARVEN, not Graven.
No problem there.Scotty didn't agree to be signed and therefore he was not signed by Green. Also Garven only expressed interest in Scotty. He never officially offered him a contract. The fact is that the CWBCC accidentally overlooked that and took the word of Green having signed Scotty as true.
BUT I'm inclined to force CW Green to take Scotty if he confirms his signing in the 24 hours or so.
No, because that way you'd be put back to 2nd in the list and we'd get ****ed over again. There's no way Colts can lose in this, because if Fitzsimmons is reversed and Green take him, you still get Raferty before I get to pick.It's really unfortunate, because each side gets ****ed over no matter what. If Black gets Raftery, Green lose out. If Green get him, Black get unfairly ****ed over. Alternatively, Green could take Fitzsimmons and Black could take Raftery, and the Colts could lose out. WAC if we did? Probably not. But the principle is there.
Didn't think of that...No, because that way you'd be put back to 2nd in the list and we'd get ****ed over again. There's no way Colts can lose in this, because if Fitzsimmons is reversed and Green take him, you still get Raferty before I get to pick.