FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
It's Liam's call, but I expect we'll take him if it gets to us. We're terribly short on batsmen right now.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* Signup Announcements/Introductions
- Thread starter Mr Mxyzptlk
- Start date
age_master
Hall of Fame Member
Samuel_Vimes said:
Green accept Mr Volavola
Loony BoB
International Captain
I suspect it's down to players being declared inactive, which is entirely understandable, however I think that we should probably think on something...vic_orthdox said:
If a team is to have a player deemed inactive, then pick up a great new player, then the inactive player becomes active again... should that inactive player now be a free agent or will they walk back into their team, giving the team a distinct advantage in number of players, and possibly getting them a 'free' quality rookie?
..
Magrat Garlick
Rather Mad Witch
That's down to luck IMO, just as it's down to luck that the players who get declared inactive have varying capabilities. We can't make it totally fair anyway, and it'd be too confusing if we kept moving rookies about just because people reactivated themselves.Loony BoB said:
In most cases, the inactives stay inactive. (Gooljar a notable exception.
)
Neil Pickup
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Surely they should have their stats trimmed as an inactivity penalty? Didn't we agree that?Loony BoB said:
Still, dunno why I care, Blacks are clearly permanently rooted to fifth in the draft order no matter who gets who...
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Yeah, it's pretty ridiculous.
Magrat Garlick
Rather Mad Witch
Most players + best achieving squad from last year + few losses due to inactivity = low in draft order.dontcloseyoureyes said:
Quite simple really.
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Best achieving squad from last year? Who won the double, now?
Magrat Garlick
Rather Mad Witch
That's just cos you choked at the end. IIRC you won both league titles, a better indication of squad quality.dontcloseyoureyes said:
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
We didn't choke, Camps cheated IMO. 
(Also, didn't we finish 3rd in OD? We didn't play the final, that's for sure.)
(Also, didn't we finish 3rd in OD? We didn't play the final, that's for sure.)
Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It ceases to be funny.dontcloseyoureyes said:We didn't choke, Camps cheated IMO.
If you want to question my integrity, be a man and come out and do it. Don't made snide remarks and try to pass them off as jokes.
Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Dude. Hence...Jamee999 said:Dude. The
Me said:
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Yeah, I really think you cheated Camps, for sure. (sarcasm, obviously)
Apart from forging a scorecard it's pretty hard to do it with ITC anyway, and I know if it was me I cbf forging a full scorecard.
Apart from forging a scorecard it's pretty hard to do it with ITC anyway, and I know if it was me I cbf forging a full scorecard.
ash chaulk
International Captain
and the commentarydontcloseyoureyes said:
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Indeed. Nobody cbf doing that much work.
Robertinho
Cricketer Of The Year
Actually, no. It's way easier than that. But it's obvious neither Liam nor Hakon would do it, so it's not an issue.