Essentially you're probably right, but I DO think we were under quite a bit of pressure at 2/80. Bracken got a pearler through Gayle, and that changed everything. But the guy was on absolute fire, with Lara still to come, and in terms of "all they needed was Gayle's wicket and it was game over", tell that to the South Africans.sqwerty said:West Indies are ordinary.
You're kidding yourself if you thought the Aussies were under pressure at 2-80 with Chanderpaul; and Sarwan gone before 8 overs. All they needed was Gayles wicket and it was game over.
3 wickets in the first 10 overs - runs are meaningless.
Windies have an ordinary attack and if their batsmen can hit the Aussie attack like that you can guarentee they'll cop it back with interest when they bowl.
Flat track, fast outfield, Windies will be lucky to hit 240.
Aussies in a canter.,...was never in doubt
Well i will stick to my first post and say Mcgrath hasnt got enough variety to handle aggressive and attacking batsman.pasag said:McGrath takes Lara for 2, you were saying?
Haha. This was silly to begin with, but it looks even better after the whole spell is finished.godofcricket said:Thats where i knew Mcgrath was never a great bowler, if a batsman attacks him he has no answer to it!!!!!! Gayle is just awesome.
Potential Greigy?? or no falling into the right criteria?FaaipDeOiad said:Haha. This was silly to begin with, but it looks even better after the whole spell is finished.
Should be a pushover for it really.Clapo said:Potential Greigy?? or no falling into the right criteria?
Well i think u should know who should be given credit for that?FaaipDeOiad said:Haha. This was silly to begin with, but it looks even better after the whole spell is finished.
Yeah, cause you know, that's why he's taken over 500 test wickets. Cause he lacks variety.godofcricket said:Well i will stick to my first post and say Mcgrath hasnt got enough variety to handle aggressive and attacking batsman.
Well if u want to bring tests into it, then i have no doubt in saying that Mcgrath is a perfect test match bowler, the best bowler for that type game. But even u have to agree that even in tests, like every other bowler he is not a bowler perfect for every situation. Dont try to argue on that basis.andyc said:Yeah, cause you know, that's why he's taken over 500 test wickets. Cause he lacks variety.