• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Second Test at the Adelaide Oval

Tom Halsey

International Coach
Again, this is not correct.

The same reason why a swing bowlers ball will swing is the same reason a spin bowlers ball will drift, with the air flying over the smooth sides of the ball. If the seam is upright or tilted to one side slightly, but remains that way throughout the ball will move accordingly.
This (to suggest Magnus Effect is not involved) contradicts the laws of physics. When a ball is undercut, or over- or underspun, a Magnus Effect is produced. It's the same way footballers swerve a seamless football and tennis players slice (or whatever) a seamless tennis ball, golfers fade or draw a seamless golf ball and so on.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Where y'at stephen, thought it was fairly set?
Huh? I never said anything of the sort.

In other news, the only way you can generate drift as a spinner is to put overspin on the ball. The wind may cause drift, but that is different. Overspin uses the rough/shiny side to cause the ball to drift as air passes more easily over one of the sides, pulling the ball to the rough side (until it's reversing).
 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I specifically said somewhat because it doesn't need to look totally like a flying saucer. It's usually a combination of sidespin and undercut. Swann is always mixing the amount of sidespin and undercut on nearly all of his deliveries. That's almost precisely why he says he's not sure which will turn and which will slide on. There's at least a bit of both on every delivery. There's usually a little bit of overspin too but nothing dramatic really.

And Lyon doesn't get a ton of overspin either. He gets a little dip, a little drift and a little turn, and varies the combination of all three with his orientation, but he doesn't have a vicious top spinner, undercutter, or off-break. Guys who really get overspin: Murali, Harbhajan, Shillingford and most recently Ashwin. Ashwin has a genuine topspinner that's almost pure overspin with a little sidespin
I implore you to watch Nathan Lyon this test and tell me he doesn't bowl with massive overspin.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Lyon bowls with almost exclusively overspin, not sure what JontyPanesar is getting at.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Lyon bowls with almost exclusively overspin, not sure what JontyPanesar is getting at.
 

LongHopCassidy

International Captain
Warner, Warner, Warner.

The day he bats through a whole day will probably never come, but it's nice to fantasise every now and then.
 

JontyPanesar

U19 Vice-Captain
I implore you to watch Nathan Lyon this test and tell me he doesn't bowl with massive overspin.
And I implore you to compare the amount of overspin Lyon gets with the amount Harbhajan or Shillingford get on their top-spinners. Or even Ashwin's top-spinner that he was bowling in that Oz series this past year. Nevertheless, Imma make dinner and if it's not too late for bedtime, then video shall settle this...
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Rogers looks so much better when he tries to play those balls on his pads wide of mid on instead of just forward of square leg. Full face of the bat and all.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
For those in England, the second session finishes at 5.05 a.m., which reminds me there used to be a polly waffle at Guildford called 505.

Or so I'm told
 

Top