outbreak
First Class Debutant
This series they've been going against the tech evidence thoughFor all those moaning about DRS, remember it was given out on the field,so no DRS and Hughes is still out.
This series they've been going against the tech evidence thoughFor all those moaning about DRS, remember it was given out on the field,so no DRS and Hughes is still out.
There was a noise on the side on camera though, so if its given out and you have technology appearing to contradict each other (even though Snicko showed he hit it) what do you do? You stay with the onfield umpire. Its not that difficult.the technology says it's not out, if your not going to trust it why the **** do you use it in the first place
Its not as simple, the technology was not able to gather ENOUGH evidence to overrule an umpire's decision.the technology says it's not out, if your not going to trust it why the **** do you use it in the first place
Plenty of times snicko has had a noise from creacking bats and other thingsI was of the same opinion. Didn't think he'd nicked it until snicko said he had.
sounded like a knick IMOPlenty of times snicko has had a noise from creacking bats and other things
Exactly this. It wasn't a howler, so didn't need overturning is the bottom-line.The very slight sound and the less-than-clear hotspot made it very hard to overturn. It's not a DRS failure.
Spikey nose bestThe very slight sound and the less-than-clear hotspot made it very hard to overturn. It's not a DRS failure.
DRS gives umpires the benefit of the doubtthe technology says it's not out, if your not going to trust it why the **** do you use it in the first place
Snicko isn't available for review so it doesn't matter what it says! You can only base your decisions on what evidence you're presented with, isn't that simple to understand?Lol what you Aussies moaning about. Snicko shows that clear as day is a thin edge.