Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Mate, you're starting to sound like an incredibly artless version of Neville Cardus, who kept imploring Bradman to play the beautiful, but short and sharp knock on the 34 tour. Wonderful to behold but just not a threat to the opposition.If you can't admit that it wasn't a pretty convincing 36 then you don't know cricket.
Spare us mate. he didn't look convincing at all, and I'm a fan of his. He's got some issues to work out,and I suspect he will. He's a good kid, but it's tough to learn on the job as a test player at 20. They should have had a third opener there, or a reserve batsman, just in case.
Did you charge for that conference when we spoke about your case on here t'other day?Good post, Burgey. You're quite right to draw attention to Ponting's post-match words, he spoke really well and fair play to him for that. The crowd rightly responded graciously too.
(Good to see he's learnt to avoid having a swipe when asked a question by a journalist on this occasion )
Seriously, another really great Test match. I honestly thought that Australia were going to do it when Clarke and Haddin made it through to stumps yesterday. And that in the teeth of a target of 522; well, it was spectacular. Clarke's innings was a great piece of work. My only real hope for victory today was an inspirational spell of fast bowling and that could only come from one man, who duly delivered an incredible performance today. Pleased also for Strauss, under pressure as captain, whose 161 obviously set up England for a reasonably competitive 1st innings score.
Now, if People Skills Pietersen is out for the third test, who will the soap dodgers bring in?
Presumably if Flintoff is out they'll bring a bowler in (Harmison most likely), or now they lead 1-0 will they play an extra batsman?