Who cares though?Letting you watch in the borstel are they mate?
Read slowly mate - it's not about whatever opinion one has (and the post had absolutely nothing to do with Hauritz's out in any event) it's about how derisory we all are (note I said we, I include you and I in that, especially you, as you seem a ****) towards these players.
Anyway mate, make of it what you will. Your opinion's about as worthwhile as that which your avatar is voiding from himself.
Australia to be dismissed for under 400.
Siddle can't bat to save himself.
Johnson is a terrible bat. He won't score a match winning score.
No Clarke and no Hauritz make Johnson something something...
Dont you see what I did there?
Reckon most of the people reading in this thread. I'd much rather read posts that have been concocted with some sort of sense behind them, instead of being based on emotion and derision when not one of the posters here has an understanding of the skills required for test cricket.Who cares though?
The players themselves arent reading this and we don't all have to be politically correct all the time.
We say what we feel at the time and we tend to over exaggerate due to passion, nerves or whatever other reason.
Just seemed a pointless rant.
Depends on how many House ends up scoring.If we win this, it will make Johnson undroppable for the third Test, right?
Indeed.Are Aus getting the same coverage as us? Gower, Atherton etc?
Yes.Are Aus getting the same coverage as us? Gower, Atherton etc?