ajdude
International Coach
me.So tell me bud, which pace bowler has a better record than Starc over the past 18 months.
me.So tell me bud, which pace bowler has a better record than Starc over the past 18 months.
Riggins has consistently out bowled you and you know it.
Being me their figures.Dale Steyn
Now you want answers from me??? Hmmmm Ok.So tell me bud, which pace bowler has a better record than Starc over the past 18 months.
Steyn 2013 - 27 wickets at 15.85Being me their figures.
Ok you may want to work out what 18 months means.Now you want answers from me??? Hmmmm Ok.
2013 - Jimmy Anderson 23 wickets at 15........Mitchell Starc 15 wickets at 18.
Bowling records | One-Day Internationals | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN CricinfoLet's for clarity for adders just round it to 2 years.
Anyone that knows your biases would know who you are talking about and anyone that has watched odis in the past 18 months knows that you are wrongAnyone who's watched one day cricket closely in the past 18 months would know who I was talking about. The fact that you didn't is embarrassing. As a hint how about you look up his cricinfo page or Wikipedia page and work from there matey.
Steyn played 4 more matches, taken four more wickets, at a worse average, and a considerably poorer strike rate.
lol.Anyone that knows your biases would know who you are talking about and anyone that has watched odis in the past 18 months knows that you are wrong
Furthermore, if Lee were still available, the young man in question wouldn't even be the best one day bowler in his home town let alone the world
BTW, explains a lot that you use wiki as a fact checker
Cricket stats are generally done over calendar years mate......you work out these players stats over 18 months and deliver them. Do your own donkey work Mr wont provide a direct answer and then bark orders for everyone else to deliver. Seriously, who the **** do you think you are mate??Ok you may want to work out what 18 months means.
I've looked into the stats, I don't need them. Maybe you want to educate yourself before trying to debate something you clearly are not schooled in.Cricket stats are generally done over calendar years mate......you work out these players stats over 18 months and deliver them. Do your own donkey work Mr wont provide a direct answer and then bark orders for everyone else to deliver. Seriously, who the **** do you think you are mate??
I actually really rate Starc in ODIs and was somewhat playing devil's advocate but he has beaten up on the WI at Perth and Afghanistan quite badly. Steyn's not ever gone round the park like Starc did against England in the CT either. There's a legitimate case for both but to say Starc is far and away the best is just wrong IMO.Steyn played 4 more matches, taken four more wickets, at a worse average, and a considerably poorer strike rate.