I remember watching that game, absolutely borefest. I beleive I stayed awake and watched 3 quarterfinals in a row through the middle of the night.BoyBrumby said:The obvious example was Janie De Beer in the 1999 WC quarter v us. Kicked five of the bloody things and totally killed the game off.
Well I have the view that if a team has an advantage and are going to get a penalty then any field goal shots should take away their advantage just like if the flyhalf spotted a gap and ran through it and got 20m on everybody else before being tackled the advantage would be over.BoyBrumby said:I'd disagree that the value of penalties should be decreased. If that happened it would be more of a licence for the killing of the ball at the ruck which is pretty endemic just now. As often as not defenders take the option that 3 points are better than 5/7, so I can only imagine it would become worse if the value of the punishment is less.
There's certainly a case for making drop-goals worth 1 or 2 points instead of 3. If the ref is properly enforcing the offside law they're more or less impossible to defend if the scrum-half delivers decent ball. I have no objection to them being used as a way of breaking the deadlock (like Jonny did in the WC final) or extending the lead beyond a converted try late on in a game like they are in League, but with them worth 3 they can be used as a soft option. The obvious example was Janie De Beer in the 1999 WC quarter v us. Kicked five of the bloody things and totally killed the game off.
Seems like the attackers think that way most of the time too.BoyBrumby said:As often as not defenders take the option that 3 points are better than 5/7