Mind my asking which Brisbane Club it was?Received a drunken phone call from a mate on Saturday who told me that club rugby in Brisbane is dead
He was attending a game at his former club for the first time in years and less than 100 people turned up whereas it would have been several thousand in his day
I trotted out some attempted excuses e.g. Wallabies playing, **** weather, your former team were all-stars (had about 10 Wallabies in their lineup iirc) etc etc
He just said nope and passed me on to a mutual friend who is a high-profile former Wallaby and he went even further
I thought club rugby was one of the few brightish spots but obviously not
ARU has a lot to answer for
Souths in the early 90sMind my asking which Brisbane Club it was?
While I was there Uni, Brothers, Easts, Sunnybank and GPS would always get pretty decent crowds. The perennial strugglers like Norths, Souths Wests and 'Gold Coast' (Now Bond) would be up and down but still have a steady following.
Finals weeks at Ballymore were regularly around 5k in the lead up semi finals and then about 8-10k for the final.
I
That said, that was 5 years ago!
I think what makes Wayne Barnes at odds with NZ viewers is that he has probably the greatest difference in interpretation of the breakdown in comparison with how it's interpreted here.Edit: Well done to Scotland.
Fun exciting game... not a popular opinion but I like Wayne Barnes as a ref. He is clear with his instructions and is consistent.
When you watch these games and compare to the NZ side, the obvious skills that the AB's have is easy to see but I truly think that the biggest single factor that is separating them from the rest of the rugby world right now is their decision making, it is superb, and something that only comes with a team of players who have been trained to read the game from early in their careers.
I think that is true for a lot of Northern versus Southern refs... he definitely allows more 'competition' at breakdown than most. I also think he is more stringent on the offside line, which I like. But mostly he lets play continue whenever he can.I think what makes Wayne Barnes at odds with NZ viewers is that he has probably the greatest difference in interpretation of the breakdown in comparison with how it's interpreted here.
I could not agree with a single one of those three penalties he gave in the last 5 mins.
This is very true, it is probably why I do like him cause I hate the players who go of their feet at the ruck unnecessarily, slowing everything down. I also detest when players go past the ruck and block or grab on to defending players. .I'm not Barnes's biggest fan, but our Stephen there makes a fair point: he is generally consistent.
Reffing union is always slightly down to interpretation and Barnes almost invariably pings anyone off their feet in a ruck who isn't the initial tackler. Means the "clear out" is chancing your luck.
He lets players lie all over the ball and doesn't force the release of the tackled player.I'm not Barnes's biggest fan, but our Stephen there makes a fair point: he is generally consistent.
Reffing union is always slightly down to interpretation and Barnes almost invariably pings anyone off their feet in a ruck who isn't the initial tackler. Means the "clear out" is chancing your luck.