so when they say there's "bad blood" they ain't kidding aroundFRAZ said:Dude Dude , Seriously to hold the soil together its necessary to put some organic liquid underneath the top core of the wicket . Plzzz dont prove me wrong guys cuzz I can prove it by showing the articles and Web pages ....
Blood is important I know But not in Shoaib's case .........
A 145 runs in 10 overs is brilliant batting/rubbish bowling.FRAZ said:By the way Pakistan is 292 / 7 after 50 and Razzaq made a Wonderful 107 And I guess after 40 Overs they were 147 .... SO excellent stuff .......
The average is probably a bit high, but the rpo isn't. Mind you I had never heard of him before.Richard said:Another fantastic Razzaq innings. Prosper bowls a good spell again.
Who the devil is this Iftikhar Anjum fellow - brought into ODI-cricket with a List-A ER of 4.42-an-over and an average of 31.50. Another Pakistani selection blunder.
Good opening spell from Shoaib Akhtar, 6-14-1. Just a single no-ball in the innings - let's hope Shabbir's taking similar action to that that the others have recently!
Are you really that surprised?from_da_lost_di said:zim lost !!
no .. disregard th e"!!" i wansn't really that excitedsteds said:Are you really tht surprised?
The economy-rate is hardly suggestive of an ODI-class bowler - given that you can expect to be about 0.1-an-over more expensive in international than domestic cricket.Craig said:The average is probably a bit high, but the rpo isn't. Mind you I had never heard of him before.
Try both.Craig said:A 145 runs in 10 overs is brilliant batting/rubbish bowling.
actually...Yasa said:well inzi has got a groin problem so he may rest...misbah will probably play for him, and they may rest shoaib for sami..
He's not the worst of ODI players by any means.Richard said:Oh no.
Not again...
How many times has he got to fail before they realise he's not ODI-class?
Why oh why oh why can't they pick someone like Salim Elahi?