OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
**** me that's good bowling from Lyon and just awful from Haddin. Wasn't anywhere near the line of the ball and the deflection was minuscule. Sitter.
Whilst I agree with selection of Smith at no. 3 (but for this test only) I have real doubts as to whether Hughes is close to being selected again in test cricket as he was hardly (if at all) mentioned by anyone connected with the team in the lead-up to this matchYeah this is the point I was making.
I get that Maxwell and Starc are basically a package team for the balance of the attack, and that's fine.. but Marsh isn't going to bowl much/at all in this attack on this wicket. Are they saying he's a better batsman than Doolan and Hughes now? Really?
We aim to please.Came in expecting an epic adub rant, not disappointed.
he thinks starc is on debut soDoes Rameez not realise that the reason the Australian attack, especially MJ has been so dangerous recently is precisely because of frequent bowling changes and short spells? Such dumb commentary
Wouldn't surprise, tbh. Stylistically, he's Ponting-lite and could go well on low and slow decks.Just got an inkling if they throw Maxwell in at 3 it'll be ridiculously successful and be seen as a master stroke of Clarke/Lehmann for years to come...
Very similar to Ponting (very fast hands and feet) with arguably a more orthodox techniqueWouldn't surprise, tbh. Stylistically, he's Ponting-lite and could go well on low and slow decks.
this is why it has to failJust got an inkling if they throw Maxwell in at 3 it'll be ridiculously successful and be seen as a master stroke of Clarke/Lehmann for years to come...
What else can they do but try stuff?Australia are redefining field placements today
hes just the sort of **** who will take some wickets now that we're making fun of him and he's started poorlySiddle to go back over 30 avg this match.