smash84
The Tiger King
Test cricket should not be used for experimentation IMO, obviously the ODI series is fair game.
Test cricket should not be used for experimentation IMO, obviously the ODI series is fair game.
Girls are usually more promising than guys at least for meSadaf Hussain will be more promising than Junaid Khan.
You heard it here first.
Why the smiley?
I don't see why test cricket should not be used for experimenting players who can do well in that format?Why the smiley?
So basically everything I said was right? Lol, I'll be sure to sugar coat my criticism of poor quality cricket next time.and what do you expect a one off T-20 right after a world cup with 2 sides trying new combinations, the match maybe of poor quality but your posting in this thread is not much better.
Glad you found that hilarious mate.
Pick the bowlers who're the likeliest to pick up wickets in the here and the now. Call it experimentation, or whatever you like. In ODI cricket, there are more things to consider like squad rotation/development of younger guys, resting players etc... all those things should not come into the picture when you are picking a Test side.I don't see why test cricket should not be used for experimenting players who can do well in that format?
ofcourse nobody is expecting this to match Pak-Windies 88 showdown but its an over reaction to say that I will not watch this series due to low quality cricket based on a single T-20 game that was just a (not so) glorified warm up to the important stuff. The quality of cricket is hardly top class during the t-20 games that takes place during any bilaterial series and this was no exception Pakistan is coming on the back of 3 highly entertaining odi series and windies are always more competitive at home so I don't know how can you just assume it will be a dud affair.So basically everything I said was right? Lol, I'll be sure to sugar coat my criticism of poor quality cricket next time.
Honestly the ground was one of the worst I've ever seen, and the cricket played on it was awful. God forbid this is pointed out.
It's a friggin international match. It's not too much to expect a minimum standard of quality, both in gameplay and location.
awtaand what do you expect a one off t-20 right after a world cup with 2 sides trying new combinations, the match maybe of poor quality but your posting in this thread is not much better.
How seriously or not he's taking a series does not predefine the quality of cricket in the series even before one ball has been bowled,or after a shoddy T20.Also,you're the first one to question his seriousness because he wanted to be rested.Someone in his immediate family was ill iirc,along with the hectic schedule of the last year,which is why he wanted to take the series off.But he decided against it after consulting his family.It's not like a gun was put against his head to make him play.Players in the past,even Pakistani players,have requested to be rested for series,and they've been granted the rest.This was nothing extraordinary.He could have decided not to go if he really wanted to.Look, I like Afridi as captain, but if you think the captain of the team (who doesn't even play test cricket, so fatigue issues should be minimal) coming out and saying he wanted to be rested isn't a sign of how seriously he's taking this series, then you're kidding yourself.
I'm praying the curators prepare a bouncy track somewhere for the tests. It'd be insane not too with Roach, Edwards and Russell hopefully all playingI'll follow the test series mainly for the West Indies bowlers and Darren Bravo. A far as a team unit they aren't much but they do have some talented players.