But a team of Afridis will score or chase down 180 in 20 overs, everytime.It's also a question of the risk that players will take throughout the innings. Slogging every ball just doesn't work. Kane and Guptill showed Afridi a lot of respect early on because he was getting some nice drift. Guptill then smashed him towards the end of the game because the platform had been set, the risk was worth it and he was more prepared to take him on. They also looked to target the short boundary and pick off the easier singles on the long.
T20 is a game where you need to play every ball but the Munro headless chicken school of smash everything is not for everyone, and even for Munro it's still super unreliable.
I honestly can't think of any gun t20 bat that smashes at a SR of 150 throughout their innings every innings. Even Gayle will build his innings.
Afridi? Averages 18
Hahathis just in - higher strike rates are better
I earnestly think Santa is our best spin option not named Jeetan Patel right now. And I think the lack of domestic wickets isn't being held against him and he's in the team on his talent.I think the idea of keeping Santa in the T20 side is more about giving him as much time around the blackcaps setup and in international cricket as possible to maximise his development as a player than saying he's our best T20 option at this exact point in time.
At the age of 23 years old he thinks more like a bowler than a batsman. He has the demeanour and mental outlook of a bowler. We will not see much from him with the bat for another 12 months unless he just "has his day" when the sun smiles on him. If he is to stick with the team then I would say his bowling will be his meal ticket for the time being.I earnestly think Santa is our best spin option not named Jeetan Patel right now. And I think the lack of domestic wickets isn't being held against him and he's in the team on his talent.
...and his ability to bat.
That's the exact opposite of what I think of Santner. It will be fun to see who is right.At the age of 23 years old he thinks more like a bowler than a batsman. He has the demeanour and mental outlook of a bowler. We will not see much from him with the bat for another 12 months unless he just "has his day" when the sun smiles on him. If he is to stick with the team then I would say his bowling will be his meal ticket for the time being.
You will like the following post.That's the exact opposite of what I think of Santner. It will be fun to see who is right.
DWTA, but good post. Clearly we're judging Santner on different criteria. You seem to be looking at his mental side, as you often do.You will like the following post.
wasn't he quite short? Maybe 5'9 or 5'10?Wheres his height? Give the people what they want
yeah Waqar carries around a gut these days. Clearly the fitness regime doesn't apply to coachesI was seated eating my meal so even though he was quite close to me, I couldn't in good conscience give you a firm estimate. I'd guess 5'10"-5'11". Looked about my height. About my size in general really, he's a biggish guy, pretty thickset and he's carrying a gut on him these days,
EDIT (because this is important)- Having briefly perused some further evidence I think Waqar may well actually be a good 6 foot as listed, and a pretty well-built guy with it. He is noticeably taller than Mohammed Amir who is laughably listed at 6'2" btw.
Dunedin is probably the best place in the world for you to be, Thierry. Frequently saw Wasim, Sanga, Mathews, the whole Afghanistan team, all of the NZ team, just walking around.TH seeing cricketers in Auckland cos Auckland is small"