I think I'd rather read that than Women's Day-esque stuff about how happy his family is and how many pets he has etc.I agree but it ruined his book, because he spent far too much time on things such as that and the Cairn's trial meaning there wasn't much substance or a build up of things and events throughout his career, or much personally about himself or his family.
The Ford review is actually a pretty good one and apt for the content that McCullum includes in his book, although if you want to see what life was like under Bracewell, Vettori, Greatbatch, Wright and Hesson in succession and also how uninspiring NZC is at the top table downwards around implementing positive change, it gives good insight into that.
Yovich didnt retire though, he went from the dizzying highs of a stuff article to humiliatingly not being offered a contract the next season.Joey Yovich 2.0
Retire by seasons end imo.
You get about four pages of it, and that's it.I think I'd rather read that than Women's Day-esque stuff about how happy his family is and how many pets he has etc.
No interest in American politics what-so-ever.hey ****face we've been missing you in this thread. i think you should post in it
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/off-topic/46729-american-politics-thread-557.html#post3754627
Lol what? Sharjeel isn't a wild slogger. He plays proper cricket shots. Has the potential to play the Warner role for Australia. Much more potential than Masood.I'm quite surprised with the move to pick Sharjeel as the back up opener to be honest. Would have expected Shan Masood to be the back up guy..given they have already given him test matches and Sharjeel, despite impressing everyone in the country, hasn't really demonstrated any evidence that he is anything other than a wild slogger. But Arthur likes him for some reason.
nahWoodcock
Latham
Williamson
Taylor
Guptill
Neesham
Watling
Patel
Southee
Wagner
Boult
^ the future