Probably not, especially with no Boult.Can NZ take 6 wickets in 21 overs with the new ball?
Yes because Pak are ranked number 2.NZ have the series won tho. Pak need to win the game not them.
How does it affect ranking points again? Do they get significantly more for a 2-0 than a 1-0?
It was but in his defence he had a disgraceful bowling attack and India had the lead to win a series in NZ after 40 whatever years so kinda understandable.I remember Dhoni setting New Zealand about 600 back in 2009. Now that was a bad declaration.
Hey, Henry's taken a wicket!
We had them 8 down at close of play and about 350 short. That one was certainly a case where we can criticize the captain for declaring too conservatively.It was but in his defence he had a disgraceful bowling attack and India had the lead to win a series in NZ after 40 whatever years so kinda understandable.
I don't disagree it was conservative but with garbage bowlers like Munaf Patel and Ishant Sharma in the team I guess he felt the need to remove even the freak possibility of something happening. Even McCullum 2014 was so unlikely that it was inconceivable.We had them 8 down at close of play and about 350 short. That one was certainly a case where we can criticize the captain for declaring too conservatively.