-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* Pakistan in England and Ireland 2016
- Thread starter Grumpy
- Start date
smash84
The Tiger King
you be happy with the revenge ODI series as always
TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's remarkable how often the side that wins the Tests (or "morally" wins) just hands the ODIs over like they don't even care.
This is why the ODIs should be first.
This is why the ODIs should be first.
weldone
Hall of Fame Member
That was the first line of the poem I guess.
Black_Warrior
Cricketer Of The Year
This has nothing to do with not caring. Pakistan LO sides have major problems..and it's not even a recent thing.
Black_Warrior
Cricketer Of The Year
Natwest ODI series? remember when Bangladesh played England and Australia and beat Australia in a match
laugh:
Magrat Garlick
Rather Mad Witch
Especially as Bangladesh had come off a Test series where they literally couldn't buy a run as long as the Tests were live.Natwest ODI series? remember when Bangladesh played England and Australia and beat Australia in a match
Other way around
Furball
Evil Scotsman
I actually spoke to a Dawood Ahmad on the phone the other day.
He was completely unintelligible, believe it or not.
Furball
Evil Scotsman
It often appears like that because people don't get that they are different formats.
wpdavid
Hall of Fame Member
That was the one.Natwest ODI series? remember when Bangladesh played England and Australia and beat Australia in a match
iirc the 2002 and 2005 series had brilliant final matches involving England vs India and Aus respectively.
If pushed, I can recall a bit about us winning against WI/Zim in 2000 and SA/Zim in 2003. And being slaughtered by Aus/Pak in 2001, and then by WI/NZ in 2004.
But the point is I can actually remember these series, which is rarely the case when we play 5 or more matches against the same side.
Last edited:
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
What I remember most from the 2005 Natwest series was Australia losing to Bangladesh and the models.
This got me thinking though. I think the Eng-Pak ODI series that year might have been the last time I watched an ODI series that was not the WC.
This got me thinking though. I think the Eng-Pak ODI series that year might have been the last time I watched an ODI series that was not the WC.
GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
I think the tri-series suffered because attendances were poor for the non-England matches, certainly if it wasn't India or Pakistan touring
I liked it when Australia came in 2010 just for ODIs. But they overeggged that pudding by inviting them most years afterwards. I realise it's not logistically feasible, but single format (or at least T20/ODI and Tests separate) tours add prestige IMO.
I liked it when Australia came in 2010 just for ODIs. But they overeggged that pudding by inviting them most years afterwards. I realise it's not logistically feasible, but single format (or at least T20/ODI and Tests separate) tours add prestige IMO.