OMGROFLwell there we go. Would've been better if moeen took rahat instead though, just for the hilarity of a guy named ali taking the wickets of two other guys called ali.
Yeah it was superb. A cracking test match - been a wonderful series really.One of the best England wins of recent times. For opposition to be 139 behind with 8 wickets left with one ball to go on day 2 on a flat pitch and go on to win by a big margin. Great win.
Second innings all 5 bowlers bowled superbly.
39 behind.One of the best England wins of recent times. For opposition to be 139 behind with 8 wickets left with one ball to go on day 2 on a flat pitch and go on to win by a big margin. Great win.
Second innings all 5 bowlers bowled superbly.
Makes up for the missed opportunity in Abu Dhabi!One of the best England wins of recent times. For opposition to be 139 behind with 8 wickets left with one ball to go on day 2 on a flat pitch and go on to win by a big margin. Great win.
Yeah sorry, meant 39. Similar to NZ at Lords last year, although it was more of a team effort rather than individual genius.39 behind.
Bit reminiscent in a way of England's win against India at Trent Bridge a few years ago.
Shame it isn't a 5 match series, been 3 good tests to watch so far for various reasons.Yeah it was superb. A cracking test match - been a wonderful series really.
Moeen probably.One of the tougher MoTM decisions i've ever seen
Beard should win, scored most runs for the winning side, and did a very good job on the final day.One of the tougher MoTM decisions i've ever seen
Yeah but it's a real "no outstanding performance" nomination - a frontline bowler who didn't get the most wickets and runs that largely were ultimately not required!Beard should win, scored most runs for the winning side, and did a very good job on the final day.
Will it be usual slow Oval wicket? Pakistan has amazing record thereIf we don't win here, Pakistan will destroy us at the Oval. We've bowled amazingly for first 9 wickets then appallingly for last one.
Nah, those runs were pretty vital when he came in both times, not sure how you can remotely say they weren't required, we could have been rolled for under 200 in the first innings, and have left them a chase of under 200 in the second if he'd gone early in both.Yeah but it's a real "no outstanding performance" nomination - a frontline bowler who didn't get the most wickets and runs that largely were ultimately not required!
Flat with tennis ball bounce in recent years.Will it be usual slow Oval wicket? Pakistan has amazing record there
No. Just no.Yeah but it's a real "no outstanding performance" nomination - a frontline bowler who didn't get the most wickets and runs that largely were ultimately not required!