• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pakistan in England 2020

Howe_zat

Audio File
I'll say that's just about England's session , though I'm including the toss in that.

The line for England runs right now is 363.5 which I'd take in a heartbeat
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Cricinfo ball by ball has been wrong from the first ball after lunch. They seem to massively struggle to correct errors on it.
 

ImpatientLime

International Regular
This is a constant surprise for me. How English cricket is always struggling for batsmen. Even when picking players who aren't doing great or don't look great, the reply is "well actually we have nobody better?" And that is baffling for me.
its a minority sport and we prioritise white ball cricket now over red.

remember the days when people used to moan about bell when all of englands top 7 averaged 40+? lol grand days
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
its a minority sport and we prioritise white ball cricket now over red.

remember the days when people used to moan about bell when all of englands top 7 averaged 40+? lol grand days
I was thinking about the almost career-long moaning about Bell being in the team a couple of weeks ago when reading a Cricinfo article about Pope.

The crux of the article was that Pope was similar in both style and ability to Bell, and that this meant he was a total godsend to the side. Times have definitely changed.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
I was thinking about the almost career-long moaning about Bell being in the team a couple of weeks ago when reading a Cricinfo article about Pope.

The crux of the article was that Pope was similar in both style and ability to Bell, and that this meant he was a total godsend to the side. Times have definitely changed.
Tbf most of the moaning was before Bell became a really good player. Say 2006-9 when we had Strauss, Cook, Vaughan, KP, Collingwood and Bell all averaging 40+ but we didn't really win any series. Part of that was Vaughan being past it and the bowling being crap, but a lot was that Bell never seemed to make enough runs compared to the opposition. Matches were a lot higher scoring at that time and we had guys like Dravid and Kallis coming over to show us how to bat in England.

We definately underrated him post 2012-ish when Test cricket in general reverted away from being the high scoring 2000s and people didn't really adjust quickly enough.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Tbf most of the moaning was before Bell became a really good player. Say 2006-9 when we had Strauss, Cook, Vaughan, KP, Collingwood and Bell all averaging 40+ but we didn't really win any series. Part of that was Vaughan being past it and the bowling being crap, but a lot was that Bell never seemed to make enough runs compared to the opposition. Matches were a lot higher scoring at that time and we had guys like Dravid and Kallis coming over to show us how to bat in England.

We definately underrated him post 2012-ish when Test cricket in general reverted away from being the high scoring 2000s and people didn't really adjust quickly enough.
I posted somewhere else about how it's completely forgotten that Bell successfully overcame his tendency to only make easy runs to become a genuinely top-tier batsman for a while. He's just remembered as an easy runs guy, which is strange and unfair. It would be like if Mitchell Johnson was now remembered as a scattergun disappointment.

That's a great ball. Needed it too.
 

Top