Nah, reckon they got it right.What do you think bad decision not selecting Monty as a second spinner?
Even more of a mistake then, first over, too close to cut. Had he smashed it for four i'd have still been criticising him.Thats because it was Hafeez the 3rd choice spinner...
No, Atherton is saying that umpires now give LBW when the batsman pushes forward with bat and pad together, when previously spinners would only get LBWs when the batsman was sweeping.Atherton is saying that DRS has allowed the spinners to get more wickets because umpires are now willing to give outs when the batsman tries to sweep but ball hits pad
Why do you say that?Nah, reckon they got it right.
I'd tend to agree. With the DRS always in the fray, umpires are allowed to be more aggressive.Atherton is saying that DRS has allowed the spinners to get more wickets because umpires are now willing to give outs when the batsman tries to sweep but ball hits pad
Hindsight is a wonderful thing but England were never going to play 2 spinners once Bresnan went home.Why do you say that?
Clearly a second spinner would have been more effective then a 3rd fast bowler here.
Ok....i get that...Hindsight is a wonderful thing but England were never going to play 2 spinners once Bresnan went home.
awtaHafeez locking his knee infront of middle stump is heart attack worthy
The second spinner option can't bat...our success is founded in batting deep.Ok....i get that...
But whats the rationality behind it?
and they would have said if it ain't broke don't fix it.The second spinner option can't bat...our success is founded in batting deep.
Ball not swinging?What is Anderson crying about with the ump?