Agent Nationaux
International Coach
The only new addition to our squad is Awais Zia. Wish Ahmad Shehzad was playing.
I agree in theory with this but in the case of Pakistan they played the game with 3 top flight spin options, one good one in Hafeez, and one average one in Malik. I wouldn't say including Rehman in particular was a mistake but I find that attack too samey and lacking in variety. If the pitch is a turner or conductive to these fellas then great. However, as we saw it took minimal turn, and they were left with one inexperienced young seamer to change things up. I think they just assumed after the test series that England are complete **** against any kind of spin and just banked on them rolling over again. Anyway, prefer a seam bowling allrounder to Malik personally, plus he's a tried and tested failure.Rehman certainly wasn't the reason you lost though; 10 overs 1/31 is a better return than Gul or Cheema would've produced almost certainly IMO and he bowled largely at the times they would've bowled too. I thought Pakistan's bowling - even on the selection front - was fine in the fourth ODI; it was the batting that let them down.
Is there a word for blaming an unconventional tactic for a failure despite what actually happened, merely because it's easy to mount a 'logical' case against without having to analyse the event? There should be as it happens all the time in cricket journalism and forum posting; maybe we should call it Qadiring.
What a crap rule.He's out there, by the looks of it.
Looked like he'd screwed it up at first but got his elbow into action.
I bet it wouldn't be if it was a England player run out.What a crap rule.
It was his elbow and the rule has been the same for years, you just have to knock the bails off with the ball in the hand.I have always been fair in my assessment when it comes to outs. So yes it would still have been crap. His shoulder knocked the bails off. **** rule.