Jokes aside, he did rip through our order single-handedly.No, no you don't.
Hence the fact that you don't have to love him.Jokes aside, he did rip through our order single-handedly.
Haha, I see that you've already given up on this match and are focusing on the next.Taufeeq looks like a walking wicket vs Swann. Maybe get Umer in for Taufeeq and open with Adnan slotting Umer at .7
I share your pessimism, but haven't lost hope yet. An early wicket at the start and I'll be right there with you.can't see us getting 120 more runs which we need to put England under some pressure.
I've been trying to get this bloody game to work for ages now, getting really pissed off that you'll go offline before I can say I've beaten you102 all out chasing 400, my best effort yet.
Reckon if I keep playing all night I'll be able to only lose by 100 by the time I go to bed.
I'm normally okay on StickCricket, but this long version has got the better of me.
Yes, but that's because India have been ****.Hmmmm.... maybe. It would be interesting to compare stats on that. I'd agree that it's helped spin bowlers get more LBWs.
The India - Aus series is being played without DRS and they're going to have 4 results out of 4.
Ajmal WAGDecided to have a bash with Pakistan just to see if I found any change in difficulty, still not close but boy did I feast on Pietersen
Which is great IMO, forces batsmen to think more about how they approach spin.Atherton said that even 10 years ago, an opening batsmen would never be given out like Hafeez was today. Says you knew you could plonk your foot down against the spinner and you were safe. That seems like a huge weapon that's been taken from the bat.
Adnan would be terrible opening. If you want to bring Umar in for Taufeeq then surely the logical move would be to open with Azhar, given he's opened a lot domestically.Taufeeq looks like a walking wicket vs Swann. Maybe get Umer in for Taufeeq and open with Adnan slotting Umer at .7