kykweer.proteas
International Debutant
Good fight from Pakistan in the second innings.
Weird tour
Sa dominate t20
Pakistan dominate ODI
Sa dominate Tests
Weird tour
Sa dominate t20
Pakistan dominate ODI
Sa dominate Tests
I'm still mega confused that they didn't choose a spinner in the second test, not because of the over rate issue but they had a very one paced bowling attack that wasn't going to trouble SA on a flat deck.England and Pakistan should have their own competition on who can collect the most over rate penalties.
Pakistan could now finish bottom.
Pakistan docked five WTC points for slow over rate during Cape Town Test
They have now lost a total of 13 points during the 2023-25 cycle, putting them in danger of a bottom-place finishwww.espncricinfo.com
They did say they'd have bowled first if they'd won the toss, so that was probably why they had no spinner.......which of course was wrong on pretty much every front.I'm still mega confused that they didn't choose a spinner in the second test, not because of the over rate issue but they had a very one paced bowling attack that wasn't going to trouble SA on a flat deck.
Just had a quick flick through the results again, one interesting factor is that SA won 6 tosses out of 7. The only one they lost I reckon was a T20 (a game they won). Pakistan did particularly well to win all 3 ODI's against the coin.Good fight from Pakistan in the second innings.
Weird tour
Sa dominate t20
Pakistan dominate ODI
Sa dominate Tests
SA made clear that they knew the nature of the pitch by picking Maharaj, so it just looked nuts to me before a ball was even bowled.They did say they'd have bowled first if they'd won the toss, so that was probably why they had no spinner.......which of course was wrong on pretty much every front.
To put all your eggs in one basket away from home is just poor planning.They did say they'd have bowled first if they'd won the toss, so that was probably why they had no spinner.......which of course was wrong on pretty much every front.
I agree, the toss matters and much more so in test cricket... it will never happen but alternating between teams over a series could make sense, home team going first.Just had a quick flick through the results again, one interesting factor is that SA won 6 tosses out of 7. The only one they lost I reckon was a T20 (a game they won). Pakistan did particularly well to win all 3 ODI's against the coin.
I've often wondered that too, but if the home team knows which way the toss is going they'll just prepare pitches to suit. Sometimes you get lucky, sometimes you don't, but that's cricket.I agree, the toss matters and much more so in test cricket... it will never happen but alternating between teams over a series could make sense, home team going first.
Other than that not sure how else they'd manage that, luck shouldn't be a factor.
Without doubt you play a spinner on our coastal wickets at Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and Durban.SA made clear that they knew the nature of the pitch by picking Maharaj, so it just looked nuts to me before a ball was even bowled.
Yeah, I've followed enough from afar (i.e. watching on tv)of games in SA over loads of years to figure out that you usually get more helpful surfaces for spinners/less heavily weighted in favour of pace bowlers on those grounds. You would have thought that an Asian side who have had more recent success with spinners actually use one of those spinners instead of a likely ordinary seamer.Without doubt you play a spinner on our coastal wickets at Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and Durban.