Belter?? From what im hearing both teams decided that tackling was to much an effort so they decided not to bother...steds said:Broncos - Raiders is a belter.
Yeah its on par with most ESL games, tackling what...Blewy said:Belter?? From what im hearing both teams decided that tackling was to much an effort so they decided not to bother...
The defence wasn't the best, but I'd much rather watch a game like that than a 10 - 4 slog or a game where there's only one side in it.Blewy said:Belter?? From what im hearing both teams decided that tackling was to much an effort so they decided not to bother...
Yes, and the Storm did deserve to win.burkey_1988 said:When you don't play well and things don't go your way, you are bound to lose. Storm didn't deserve to win, but the Dragons deserved to lose more. However, I'm going to have another rant about the referees. They are absolute crap. The end.
Did anyone else see the Dragons-Storm match?
it was alright, brisbane showed character in coming back from 18 behind, geez we were ordinary in the first half, but there were a lot of positives in the 2nd 40...steds said:Broncos - Raiders is a belter.
Schiffers had a shocker though.broncoman said:it was alright, brisbane showed character in coming back from 18 behind, geez we were ordinary in the first half, but there were a lot of positives in the 2nd 40...
How many stupid penalties does he want to blow and that sin binning was a fairly crucial call.Blaze said:Yes, and the Storm did deserve to win.
Archer had a good game IMO other than sending that guy to the sin bin.
Maybe the players shouldn't give them away?burkey_1988 said:How many stupid penalties does he want to blow and that sin binning was a fairly crucial call.
Friday night had a total of 5 penalties, allowing for a good fair game. However, if Tony Archer had been officiating he would have found quite a few more. Referees need to stop being so picky and not be so harsh on the defending team. I really am sick of referees having such a large, and unnecessary, influence on the game.Craig said:Maybe the players shouldn't give them away?
That might be a start...
That is such a kick in the nads! If I'd have trusted my instincts I'd have had 5/7.BoyBrumby said:For Mr Wright's comp:
Panthers
Cowboys
Broncos
Dragons
Warriors
Knights
Sea Eagles
Changed my mind on two in mid-week, Storm-Dragons & Warriors-Dogs, so if they go the way of my original thinking I'll be gutted. I'm banking on Cronk being out for Melbourne.
He gave penalties, both ways, that were just unwarranted. It ruins the game, one thing that really frustrates me when watching most matches.Blaze said:Archer did a good job. The Dragons were their own worst enemy.
I don't think so. It was a silly call, for sure, but after the first 10 minutes or so the Dragons didn't look like winning so I don't think that sinbinning really made a lot of difference.burkey_1988 said:How many stupid penalties does he want to blow and that sin binning was a fairly crucial call.
I reckon that might just be a little frustration on your part there mate. For the most part the refs do alright. If the players would stop holding down in the tackle so much there wouldn't be so much of a problem.burkey_1988 said:He gave penalties, both ways, that were just unwarranted. It ruins the game, one thing that really frustrates me when watching most matches.
Yep and have been like that for a few seasons now.mundaneyogi said:I don't think so. It was a silly call, for sure, but after the first 10 minutes or so the Dragons didn't look like winning so I don't think that sinbinning really made a lot of difference.
Odd that the Dragons have been so hot and cold this season. Weren't they the bookie's favourite at the start of the year?