It's fine for Lee to be manacing for short spells in a ODI. However, when the batsman are under no pressure to score at a rate, he isn't as potent, which is why his record isn't anywhere near as good in tests as it is in ODI. Kaspa spent far too long on the sidelines, it's about time something went his way, and he did bowl well today, he had chances drop short or go near on at least two situations. If Langer and Warne had of held on to their simple catches, it could be a very different story.Dydl said:Well, I guess they have Gillespie's value as a bowler to think about. I think that if anyone had to be dropped for the 2nd test it would be Kasper. McGrath will not go out unless of injury, and I don't think that the selectors would be willing to drop Gillespie, it would be too much of a risk.
As stated above, I think, that if anyone should be dropped for the 2nd test, Kasprowicz should. Lee was terrifying the New Zealand batsmen (not quite) and I still don't understand why they let him carry the drinks AGAIN!!
Kasprowicz didn't do that well today anyway??
Mister Wright said:and he did bowl well today, he had chances drop short or go near
Yeah, I was answering your question for you.Dydl said:I couldn't watch the day because I don't have fox, so I didn't know whether he bowled well or not, that is why I put the question marks there!
McMillan and McCullum are more than capable batsmen at numbers six and seven, while Vettori has proven recently that his batting can be more than useful. Franklin can also be a difficult player to bowl to once he gets himself in so I don't think the depth is that bad to be honest.marc71178 said:I did actually just look at the rest of the batting to see what was in store - that must be one of the longest NZ tails in a long time - makes the first hour tomorrow crucial.
how so?????marc71178 said:I did actually just look at the rest of the batting to see what was in store - that must be one of the longest NZ tails in a long time - makes the first hour tomorrow crucial.
Wright by name, right by nature.Mister Wright said:It's fine for Lee to be manacing for short spells in a ODI. However, when the batsman are under no pressure to score at a rate, he isn't as potent, which is why his record isn't anywhere near as good in tests as it is in ODI. Kaspa spent far too long on the sidelines, it's about time something went his way, and he did bowl well today, he had chances drop short or go near on at least two situations. If Langer and Warne had of held on to their simple catches, it could be a very different story.
I'd like to echo these comments. They really needed a day like this to get some confidence if this test series is going to be competitive.Jono said:Well played New Zealand. Absolutely terrific to see Marshall get his maiden ton. Its just a damn shame I was at uni whilst this was occuring.
Yes, but can they afford to bat for four days?zinzan12 said:New Zealand need 500 minimum to put them in the box seat.
Dead right about his action from around the wicket. I actually quite like the way he does it, because he's accurate enough most of the time to keep it from going across the pads. Without a lot of spin, that kind of angle helps to open up a bit of a gate. When he spears the ball in it can be quite a problem.FaapDeOiad said:Well, if you've seen Clarke's action (he got some help from Lehmann I think) he bowls from very wide on the crease when he goes around the wicket.
Might have something to do with this; Gillespie's last 20 Tests:I think we might see Lee in the 2nd test. What I'm wondering is why Gillespie's place hasn't been in question.
Exactly. Well said.It's fine for Lee to be manacing for short spells in a ODI. However, when the batsman are under no pressure to score at a rate, he isn't as potent, which is why his record isn't anywhere near as good in tests as it is in ODI. Kaspa spent far too long on the sidelines, it's about time something went his way, and he did bowl well today, he had chances drop short or go near on at least two situations. If Langer and Warne had of held on to their simple catches, it could be a very different story.
You've got 2 weak men at the bottom!anzac said:how so?????
So far as the bowlers are concerned we still have Vettori, and Franklin at #9 bats in the middle order as an 'allrounder' for his State side & has a 1st class ton. The other 2 bowlers being O'Brien & C Martin.
sure we are missing the like of Styris & Oram from the middle order, but we have replaced both with batsmen - a 6-4 instead of a 5-5 - so I'm bemused as to how this is a longer tail?????.
marc71178 said:You've got 2 weak men at the bottom!
Compared to previous numbers 10 and 11 that is!
But he is Opening the bowling this morning ....... NZ should not lose wickets in the first hour ....Mister Wright said:Glen McGrath has a slight injury.