Three.Think I count four umpiring shockers in that innings. Raza's lbw last night looked 50/50 as well. Really unfortunate for Zimbabwe.
but it was wrong, common sense and a video replay review would have shown thatThree.
The Cremer lbw was a reasonable call in real time. Looked to have hit bat and pad and Cremer was pushing the pad a little ahead of the bat.
Why QDK? Is he a bit of a Watson when it comes to DRS?All I can say is I hope Faf uses DRS better that AB does..... (oh and not to trust QDK!)
Video replay, yes.but it was wrong, common sense and a video replay review would have shown that
You appear to be missing the point that it is literally the umpires entire job to decide whether it hits the bat or pad first, and given the rest of their glaring errors in this match it is fair enough to not feel very charitable towards them,Video replay, yes.
Common sense, how? Batsman is thrusting his pad down the line of the stumps to an offie bowling around the wicket. Ball straightens, takes bat/pad or pad/bat and would have gone on to hit the stumps. Is it common sense to think that it must have been bat first ???
Very excitable....he has convinced AB to go for a number of referrals where the bat and ball where an inch apart and no sound... I will put it down to youth at the moment.Why QDK? Is he a bit of a Watson when it comes to DRS?
Thought he was good when the Lankans visited last year.Reifel's been *** for a while now hasn't he?
I could be wrong, it might just be coincidental that I've seen just about all his bad ones then.Thought he was good when the Lankans visited last year.
Checked Cricinfo scorecards, last 3 tests with DRS for Pistol:
NZ v SL, 5 DRS appeals, 4 struck down, 1 upheld.
Pak v Eng (UAE), 8 appeals, 7 struck down, 1 upheld
Pak v Eng (UAE), 8 appeals, 8 struck down.
Or perhaps you meant some earlier series?