aussie
Hall of Fame Member
word.....marc71178 said:Jury's still out on that - his Test record is very misleading.
word.....marc71178 said:Jury's still out on that - his Test record is very misleading.
well both pigeon & Warne came back after lenghty layoffs & took 5 for's & haven't looked back, ya never know the same may happen with Bond...marc71178 said:1 game after 2 and a half years is not enough to prove anything though.
He would have played more than 1 game considering there are more matches than that in the tri series he is playing inmarc71178 said:1 game after 2 and a half years is not enough to prove anything though.
I wonder why you said that then!marc71178 said:There was no way they could've picked him at the time because he was unproven since his injury.
Had the game happened a couple of months later then he'd likely have been in there.
Yes, but you also don't know what the next few games can hold.aussie said:well both pigeon & Warne came back after lenghty layoffs & took 5 for's & haven't looked back, ya never know the same may happen with Bond...
Because he'd have had time to play a whole series and see how his body reacted?Pratyush said:I wonder why you said that then!
And his ears aren't as big.honestbharani said:India needs to get rid of Dhoni. Did u guys see that shot he played? And we have people calling him the next Gilchrist. I mean, he could be the next Gilchrist, except that he can't bat or keep like him.
lol, in that case, Agarkar might have a better shot at being the next Gilchrist.vic_orthdox said:And his ears aren't as big.
If he was provisionally selected he would play a whole series and not just one match too. So I dont see a point you have on the arguement.marc71178 said:Because he'd have had time to play a whole series and see how his body reacted?