Hmm a practice video I took at the local club is better quality than that:VIDEO: BlackCaps victorious in T20 warm-up - 3 Sport - Video - 3 News
No Mitch wickets recorded, poor.
This is a man who used to smoke reefer in his hotel room on tour reporting cricket matches, not bothering to go to the ground unless absolutely necessary. Think he's having another baked moment even bringing that nonsense up.I heard Richard Boock told Brendon Telfer he had an inkling that McCullum may well keep wickets in the Test matches.
What a dreadful tour that was. That article, though, highlights that Cumming really should've had more opportunities, especially when you consider the merry-go-round of openers that followed.Was this from the last time you guys toured? Features : Craig Cumming remembers getting his face rearranged by Dale Steyn in 2007 | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
This is an excellent analysis. I'd be interested to see some footage of Kuggeleijn batting - in the Dompost they said he looked like Cairns in getting his 156. He could be competing with this group pretty soon.All right, since it's obvious this series is being viewed as a trial for the next limited overs allrounder, to get this thread moving lets place our bets.
Anderson - highest ceiling of the three, and potentially world class in both departments. Unfortunately he's on the floor of the room with the very high ceiling (to steal a quote from PEWS).
Munro - The most limited of the three due to his batting technique and his bowling is the weakest of this lot. His eye is as good as either and he makes hitting look easy. He has also been the most effective of the three with the bat across all formats so far.
Neesham - Equal with Anderson with the bat in terms of raw potential, but has been more effective with bat and ball. He is currently the most effective bowler of the three.
Batting (on results) - Munro, Neesham, Anderson
Batting (on potential) - Anderson = Neesham, gap, Munro
Bowling (on results) - Neesham, daylight, Anderson = Munro
Bowling (on potential) - Anderson, daylight, Neesham, daylight, Munro
I'm going to place my bet on Jimmy Neesham. He combines ability with progress.
I'm expecting to be told to taste it over the newest candidate for Genuine Fast Bowler Who Doesn't Break Down as well. I have a hunch McClenaghan will enjoy South African conditions quite a lot with his style of bowling.
Not going to taste it ftr. I was right in 2009. It's 2012 now.
lol, maybe in the sense that he was hitting the ball powerfully, but I can't think of any other similarities between the two. Zero foot movement, and just swinging through the line a lot of the time.This is an excellent analysis. I'd be interested to see some footage of Kuggeleijn batting - in the Dompost they said he looked like Cairns in getting his 156. He could be competing with this group pretty soon.
What's the highest in the order these guys could come in? Could Munro or Anderson bat at 4 in ODI's?
hehe, cool. I've just tracked down the article (also I got his score mixed up with Southee's - it was 142 not out).lol, maybe in the sense that he was hitting the ball powerfully, but I can't think of any other similarities between the two. Zero foot movement, and just swinging through the line a lot of the time.
Kuggeleijn Reveals Hidden Batting Talents | Stuff.co.nzNot a huge foot-mover, he prefers to stand tall, and slightly to the leg side of the ball, and then hit hard through the line.
At times yesterday he resembled Chris Cairns and developing into a genuine allrounder is definitely his aim.
"In three or four years I want to be batting [at] six or seven and scoring a lot of runs, but we'll see how it goes," Kuggeleijn said.