It missed the bat by about three inches. "Hilariously inept" would be the pair of adjectives I'd use.oz_fan said:According to cricinfo it was off the pads and not the bat.
Yeah he got kicked off after the last time he adjudicated NZ vs Saffies I think. I seem to remember him umpiring with Aleem Dar (who was new then). Asoka added a distinct element of randomness to the game, to put it nicely.Isolator said:Exactly why did they allow De Silva back in the elite panel? If he were a football ref he'd be dead by now.
particularly if he was South American football refIsolator said:Exactly why did they allow De Silva back in the elite panel? If he were a football ref he'd be dead by now.
That takes a whole team strategy out of the equation though.Loony BoB said:I still think they should set it up so that the visiting side always gets to choose if they bat or bowl.
One could argue that it was a couple of dodgy decisions that put them in place to show some spine.thedarkmullet said:Its good to see the kiwis showing a bit more spine yesterday despite a couple of dodgy descisions.
Yes NZ did get a couple in their favour in the SAF innings (Boucher, Hall), but that is against the bad ones NZ got in the first innings (Fleming, Oram), and then there was McCullum in the second innings.marc71178 said:One could argue that it was a couple of dodgy decisions that put them in place to show some spine.
How is the pitch playing? I mean, is it the pitch that's caused these scores, or just the bowlers?Sw1fty said:Geez that ball from Ntini kept low, haven't seen alot of that on this pitch