I prefer pitches where the batsman has to work for runs... I think most people do. I just have a problem with the variable bounce from Day 1.Langeveldt said:And not surprising to see people moaning about the pitch.. With all the run fests on flat tracks that make this amazing sport so dull, why can't the batsmen have some work to do once in a while? I guess either way the groundsman is damned
Christo Erasmus the Newland's groundsman seems to be struggling in preparing the next test pitch...Langeveldt said:And not surprising to see people moaning about the pitch.. With all the run fests on flat tracks that make this amazing sport so dull, why can't the batsmen have some work to do once in a while? I guess either way the groundsman is damned
There's being made to work for your runs, then there's this. That ball that got Oram really illustrated the poor quality of this pitch for mine.Langeveldt said:And not surprising to see people moaning about the pitch.. With all the run fests on flat tracks that make this amazing sport so dull, why can't the batsmen have some work to do once in a while? I guess either way the groundsman is damned
Maybe so but Oram could have at least tried to get forward instead of just doing absolutely nothing, looked like he was taking a batting masterclass from Herschelle Gibbs.mundaneyogi said:There's being made to work for your runs, then there's this. That ball that got Oram really illustrated the poor quality of this pitch for mine.
Prince EWS said:I honestly don't think moving Mills up the order was a bad idea. Sure, it didn't work and he got out for a duck, but as was shown by the fact that Fleming failed as well, he's vulnerable to the new ball. If Mills had hung around for 20 odd (which I believe he could have, given his straight batted technique), the game could have been significantly different. If he didn't go in at all, the game would be very much the same at this point. There wasn't much to lose by elevating your #9 batsman if you think about it, and there was quite a bit to gain if you think it through.
Sure, it didn't work, but I still support the decision.
Fulton doesn't look like a top order player to me at all, really. I haven't seen a great deal of him, but from what I saw, he looked more like a #5 than an opener or #3.Blaze said:I would have taken it a step further and sent him out with Marshall at the start. Fulton is a number 3 and Fleming is struggling against the new ball.
I know he's batted there a lot in domestic cricket, but I just don't think he looks solid enough in defence to bat at #3. I'd bat him at #5.Well, that's odd of you to say Prince EWS. Fulton has played nearly all of his life batting at #3 and now you say he doesn't look like a #3 at all? Ok.
Mills has a better technique to combat the new ball than Franklin, despite the fact that Franklin has scored more runs in domestic cricket.I do mind that Mills would be promoted or open. Basically because the man hasn't scored any runs in 4 years in cricket and you would want to push him up the order to face the likes of Ntini? Franklin would have been a much better option.
Interesting, Cape Town in April isn't the best weatherwise, but I guess thats a problem with the administrators..TT Boy said:Christo Erasmus the Newland's groundsman seems to be struggling in preparing the next test pitch...
http://www.news24.com/News24/Sport/Cricket/0,,2-9-839_1918447,00.html
So on the basis on a Test match, you suddenly think Fulton does not have a good defensive game? Have you even seen him play outside of this match?Prince EWS said:I know he's batted there a lot in domestic cricket, but I just don't think he looks solid enough in defence to bat at #3. I'd bat him at #5.
Mills has a better technique to combat the new ball than Franklin, despite the fact that Franklin has scored more runs in domestic cricket.
As I've said before, I have no problems with greentops, or pitches that take turn from the first morning. It's the tracks that give none of the batsmen any confidence at all to go back or forward that are a danger. I'm surprised there haven't been more broken fingers or ribs from this test.Langeveldt said:And not surprising to see people moaning about the pitch.. With all the run fests on flat tracks that make this amazing sport so dull, why can't the batsmen have some work to do once in a while? I guess either way the groundsman is damned
I havent even seen this test match!So on the basis on a Test match, you suddenly think Fulton does not have a good defensive game? Have you even seen him play outside of this match?
He plays straight and has good judgement.Mills' technique.....meh. It's not great at all. Not much foot movement, and is thus the reason he has not scored any runs for a long long long time.
Sir Clive's mate, Alistair Campbell, could learn a thing or two about positive spin from NZ Cricket's media boys, it seems...sirjeremy11 said:How's this for the ultimate in optimism...
(from the NZ Cricket Website)
BLACKCAPS seek final day victory
Hamish Marshall and Daniel Vettori will look to rescue a famous victory for the BLACKCAPS over their South African hosts at Centurion after staging a fight back on day four
Go West - King of Wishful Thinking