Yeah, you haven't had a 50 run partnership since Young got out.We've actually batted for more overs than India but are 100 runs behind. Needed an innings like Lyer.
Yeah, you haven't had a 50 run partnership since Young got out.We've actually batted for more overs than India but are 100 runs behind. Needed an innings like Lyer.
True that. Definitely going to get a lot more of those grubbers later.The other problem with just batting time and not scoring in the context of this match is the fact we're batting 4th. If we were batting 3rd, there'd be a decent argument for just batting time.
That was tied for 2nd in scores made if you're referring to Christchurch 2018. Forgot if you added the Murray innings to your list or not.Probably Wagner vs England?
thanks very much for looking that up Xix3* off 100 by JT Murray for England vs Australia in Sydney 1963.
EDIT: The query.
Just looked at your query g Miller 7thanks very much for looking that up Xix
That inning by JT Murray was in the second inning
We are after the slowest 100 ball effort in the first inning
Rachin played genuine shots, did not look panicked or hurried.The heck... Went away for dinner hoping Taylor and Latham will see through the session but I see we're nowhere. Neither runs or have wickets on hand.
Kane and Taylor not much. In comparison to all our batters Rachin got to some runs quicker compared to rest of the middle order. Edges or genuine shots? Looked panic and struggled?
What about Nicholls?
The best thing with this forum is guys are so knowledgeable without agenda. Sometimes just going back few pages tells how it all went. Even Cricinfo can be a bit biased depending on who's covering in that particular dayRachin played genuine shots, did not look panicked or hurried.
Nicholls had no idea.
What is it now?Jamieson needs to lift his game to match axar's average.