NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
I was making a cat referenceNo.
Well, not in the traditional context of what a 'life' means in cricket.
I was making a cat referenceNo.
Well, not in the traditional context of what a 'life' means in cricket.
Or he could go mental and smash some quick one.Taylor a prime chop on candidate on a pitch like this.
He did it on multiple occasions, not just the one they showed. Running right through the centre of the pitch in the danger zone, and then right in front of the non-striker.Clearly you're just switching tabs, because I saw the graphic. It was skimming.
Just like Tom Latham is skimming on the verge of a match defining ton.
Feel like Southee>Anderson would be an opinion more then 50% of the posters on here would agree with. I would wait until the end of this series to really seperate the two though, both have won there sides series in the subcontinent (England in India 2011). If southee can produce another good spell and nz win the series it would be a huge bonus for his record.Meh, il get killed for saying this but bowling skill vs bowling skill southee is better than alot of his contemporaries, yes including Anderson and broad. Just wished some of these nz players got to play as many games.
Nice. Run out opportunity!Anyone other than Tom and Kane would deliberately run into him to drive the point home.
You misinterpreted what you were seeing. I'm reading the book of truth literally and you're reading it from a perspective.He did it on multiple occasions, not just the one they showed. Running right through the centre of the pitch in the danger zone, and then right in front of the non-striker.
You dont understand how the danger area works, do you?He did it on multiple occasions, not just the one they showed. Running right through the centre of the pitch in the danger zone, and then right in front of the non-striker.
Please explain to me oh wise oneYou dont understand how the danger area works, do you?
Lol... the danger area starts a few feet from the crease, not straight from the stumps. Ottherwise no fast bowler ever will be able to follow through. Ashwin was never getting an inch into the danger area. The issue was that he was coming in the way of the non-striker and umpire and that is for them to sort it out. Ultimately it is creating a new angle as no bowler ever delivers from that close to the stumps and IMHO, as long as the bowler is able to deliver it (and it is very tough and can cause injury if you do it too long) I dont mind allowing it. Of course, you have to ensure you dont get in the way of the non-striker and if you do when they are running, you should be cut the penalty runs which the law dictates.Please explain to me oh wise one
He wasn't running on it for one.Please explain to me oh wise one
Before there's about 25 more posts on this, the danger area doesn't begin right in front of the crease, it's a few feet from the crease. Ashwin is skipping right across the crease, so he's not actually stepping into the danger area.Please explain to me oh wise one