Days of Grace
International Captain
The big difference is Segwag and Zaheer opening up the batting and bowling and both being world-class at their respective disciplines. Something that India has arguably never had before.
Harbhajan took 177 wickets @26.8 SR 59, 15 fifers, 3 10ers in the 37 tests he played for Ganguly. He has only 2 Fifers under Dhoni in 20 test matches. Clearly suggesting that Bhajji isn't the bowler he was under Ganguly.Harbhajan only had that one great series in 2001; he has been mediocre ever since with a sporadic noteworthy match here and there.
Zaheer has been good, Harbhajan has been much worse. And not having Kumble is a huge huge disadvantage at home.Zaheer Khan under MS Dhoni has been a much better bowler than he was under Ganguly; Srinath was at the fag end of his career. Kumble, yes, made a difference.
India didn't have a weak side, we were pretty good. Check how we played against Australia. We were inconsistent.And India was a relatively weak side back then, relative to the rest that is. That is not the case now. I don't see how that is denying Dhoni credit for his success ?
He is not even close to Sourav in ODIs, in Tests he has already surpassed Sourav .Lastly, I would agree that MS Dhoni has not surpassed Sourav Ganguly as an ODI captain, but he has done enough to warrant a comparison. To quote an earlier post of mine from another thread :
at Zaheer being world class despite averaging in 30s.The big difference is Segwag and Zaheer opening up the batting and bowling and both being world-class at their respective disciplines. Something that India has arguably never had before.
He averages 26 under Dhoni though, which is the point.at Zaheer being world class despite averaging in 30s.
Check out the fast bowlers under ganguly & Dhoni:Harbhajan took 177 wickets @26.8 SR 59, 15 fifers, 3 10ers in the 37 tests he played for Ganguly. He has only 2 Fifers under Dhoni in 20 test matches. Clearly suggesting that Bhajji isn't the bowler he was under Ganguly.
Zaheer has been good, Harbhajan has been much worse. And not having Kumble is a huge huge disadvantage at home.
India didn't have a weak side, we were pretty good. Check how we played against Australia. We were inconsistent.
DudeHe is not even close to Sourav in ODIs, in Tests he has already surpassed Sourav .
AwtaWe've done SRT a favour here. His 50th century will be a lot more meaningful if it comes in a battle between the world's top two cricketing nations, than if it had been made against an impotent bowling lineup on a flat track.
bloody hell!laxman looking superb so far
Jinxed it.Laxman looking superb so far
Do it again! Do it again!Laxman looking superb so far